ArticleHeliyon2021
Researchers' ethical perspective about women participation in research studies in Jordan.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A qualitative study on cultural sensitivity during survey fieldwork for early childhood caries in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: bridging the gap between culture and science.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Translation, adaptation and validation of the AWACAN tool for breast and cervical cancer awareness among Arabic-speaking women: a study from Libya.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- The Socioeconomic Impact of Diseases of Working Equids in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Critical Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Social determinants of health in rural Indian women & effects on intervention participation.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Association of Substance Use Pattern and Family Factors With Use-Related Problems According to Arabic Drug Abuse Screening Test-10: A Cross-Sectional Study.Substance use : research and treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Women participation in research studies has been an issue especially in developing countries with conservative cultural and religious beliefs. This study was aimed to assess researchers about ethical and cultural issues related to the women participation in research studies. A descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among researchers from different health disciplines in Jordan. Results showed that to encourage females' participation in research studies, majority of the researchers (66.7%) indicated that they will always preferably consider hiring a female research assistant for studies that include female participants, especially when the study protocol involves direct contact with participants. Additionally, large proportion of researchers believed that females are more likely to avoid research studies if they involve overnight-stay outside home (87.5%), performing physical exercise (72.2%) or smoking tobacco products in non-private room at the research center (68.8%). Finally, 31.3% of researchers disagreed that women in society of Jordan have the freedom to decide on research studies participation, and 47.2% of researcher respondents indicated that females must seek the consent of male relatives, such as father, husband, brother, or other family member upon her participation in research studies. In conclusion, researchers in Jordan are considerate to cultural and religious norms. Researchers who are unfamiliar with the norms of culture must consider barriers discussed in the current study to increase the participation rate of female in their research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.