ReviewInternational journal of health policy and management2022
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide.
Review in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Equity in Topic Selection for Orphan Medicinal Products: Policy Implications for Health Technology Assessment in Rare Diseases.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- From implicit to explicit: an evidence-informed deliberative process for health benefits package revision using the WHO UHC Compendium in Kyrgyzstan.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Article
- Health technology assessment in Ghana: the development of the process guidelines using evidence-informed deliberative processes.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- A 10-Step Method for Fair Priority-Setting Processes: A Qualitative Case Study from Zanzibar.Health systems and reform · 2025Article
- Engaging stakeholders along health technology assessment pathways: a scoping review of international practice.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Towards institutionalizing HTA in Ethiopia: using a political economy analysis to explore stakeholder perspectives and assessing capacity needs.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- An integrated framework to guide evidence-informed public health policymaking.Journal of public health policy · 2025Review
- Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Road toward institutionalizing health technology assessment in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi: The role of evidence-informed deliberative processes.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- Designing an evidence-informed package of essential health services for Universal Health Coverage: lessons learnt and challenges to implementation in Liberia.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Understanding the extent of economic evidence usage for informing policy decisions in the context of India's national health insurance scheme: Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (PM-JAY).BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Can sugar taxes be used for financing surgical systems in Nigeria? A mixed-methods political economy analysis.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- An overview of the perspectives used in health economic evaluations.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Review
- Topic identification, selection, and prioritization for health technology assessment in selected countries: a mixed study design.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Article
- Integrated Approach to Patient Engagement in Obtaining Dental Services.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2024Article
- The development of a roadmap for Health Technology Assessment implementation in Moldova.F1000Research · 2024Article
- Evidence-Informed Surgical Systems Strengthening with Meaningful Stakeholder Involvement in Low-Resource Settings: A Response to Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Moving Towards Effective and Efficient Implementation of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design: A Response to Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCountries around the world are using health technology assessment (HTA) for health benefit package design. Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) are a practical and stepwise approach to enhance legitimate health benefit package design based on deliberation between stakeholders to identify, reflect and learn about the meaning and importance of values, informed by evidence on these values. This paper reports on the development of practical guidance on EDPs, while the conceptual framework of EDPs is described in a companion paper.
methodsThe first guide on EDPs (2019) is further developed based on academic knowledge exchange, surveying 27 HTA bodies and 66 experts around the globe, and the implementation of EDPs in several countries. We present the revised steps of EDPs and how selected HTA bodies (in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Scotland, Thailand and the United Kingdom) organize key issues of legitimacy in their processes. This is based on a review of literature via PubMed and HTA bodies' websites.
resultsHTA bodies around the globe vary considerable in how they address legitimacy (stakeholder involvement ideally through participation with deliberation; evidence-informed evaluation; transparency; and appeal) in their processes. While there is increased attention for improving legitimacy in decision-making processes, we found that the selected HTA bodies are still lacking or just starting to develop activities in this area. We provide recommendations on how HTA bodies can improve on this.
conclusionThe design and implementation of EDPs is in its infancy. We call for a systematic analysis of experiences of a variety of countries, from which general principles on EDPs might subsequently be inferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.