ArticlePulmonary circulation
Vasodilator therapy for pulmonary hypertension in children: a national study of patient characteristics and current treatment strategies.
Article in Pulmonary circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sildenafil in bronchopulmonary dysplasia-associated pulmonary hypertension: developmental and translational insights.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Navigating Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges of Pulmonary Hypertension in Infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Risk factors for isolated atrial septal defect secundum morbidity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in targeted therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Molecular genetics of pulmonary hypertension in children.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary vasodilator therapy is still often an off-label treatment for pulmonary hypertension in children. The aim of this nationwide register-based study was to assess patient characteristics and strategies for pulmonary vasodilator therapy in young Swedish children. Prescription information for all children below seven years of age at treatment initiation, between 2007 and 2017, was retrieved from the National Prescribed Drug Register, and medical information was obtained by linkage to other registers. All patients were categorized according to the WHO classification of pulmonary hypertension. In total, 233 patients had been prescribed pulmonary vasodilators. The treatment was initiated before one year of age in 61% (N = 143). Sildenafil was most common (N = 224 patients), followed by bosentan (N = 29), iloprost (N = 14), macitentan (N = 4), treprostinil (N = 2) and riociguat (N = 2). Over the study period, the prescription rate for sildenafil tripled. Monotherapy was most common, 87% (N = 203), while 13% (N = 20) had combination therapy. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (N = 82, 35%) and/or congenital heart defects (N = 156, 67%) were the most common associated conditions. Eight percent (N = 18) of the patients had Down syndrome. Cardiac catheterization had been performed in 39% (N = 91). Overall mortality was 13% (N = 30) during the study period. This study provides an unbiased overview of national outpatient use of pulmonary vasodilator therapy in young children. Few cases of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension were found, but a large proportion of pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital heart defects or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Despite treatment, mortality was high, and additional pediatric studies are needed for a better understanding of underlying pathologies and evidence of treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.