ArticleJournal of bionic engineering2022
A Novel Evaluation Strategy to Artificial Neural Network Model Based on Bionics.
Article in Journal of bionic engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conceptual Design and Additive Manufacturing of a Bidirectional Gradient Gyroid Structure for Tibial Stem.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- A novel multimodal computer-aided diagnostic model for pulmonary embolism based on hybrid transformer-CNN and tabular transformer.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- >Water quality prediction of artificial intelligence model: a case of Huaihe River Basin, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Bionic Artificial Neural Networks in Medical Image Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine English Translation Evaluation System Based on BP Neural Network Algorithm.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous deepening of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) research, ANN model structure and function are improving towards diversification and intelligence. However, the model is more evaluated from the pros and cons of the problem-solving results and the lack of evaluation from the biomimetic aspect of imitating neural networks is not inclusive enough. Hence, a new ANN models evaluation strategy is proposed from the perspective of bionics in response to this problem in the paper. Firstly, four classical neural network models are illustrated: Back Propagation (BP) network, Deep Belief Network (DBN), LeNet5 network, and olfactory bionic model (KIII model), and the neuron transmission mode and equation, network structure, and weight updating principle of the models are analyzed qualitatively. The analysis results show that the KIII model comes closer to the actual biological nervous system compared with other models, and the LeNet5 network simulates the nervous system in depth. Secondly, evaluation indexes of ANN are constructed from the perspective of bionics in this paper: small-world, synchronous, and chaotic characteristics. Finally, the network model is quantitatively analyzed by evaluation indexes from the perspective of bionics. The experimental results show that the DBN network, LeNet5 network, and BP network have synchronous characteristics. And the DBN network and LeNet5 network have certain chaotic characteristics, but there is still a certain distance between the three classical neural networks and actual biological neural networks. The KIII model has certain small-world characteristics in structure, and its network also exhibits synchronization characteristics and chaotic characteristics. Compared with the DBN network, LeNet5 network, and the BP network, the KIII model is closer to the real biological neural network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.