Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34932127›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2022

[Position paper on stroke aftercare of the German Stroke Society-Part 3: structural concepts for future forms of care of stroke aftercare].

Christopher J Schwarzbach, Dominik Michalski, Markus Wagner, Tobias Winkler, Stephen Kaendler, Matthias Elstner, Andrea Dreßing, Joseph Claßen, Andreas Meisel, Armin Grau and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J SchwarzbachNeurologische Klinik, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland. schwarch@klilu.de.
Dominik MichalskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Markus WagnerStiftung Deutsche Schlaganfall-Hilfe, Gütersloh, Deutschland.
Tobias WinklerKlinik für Neurologie, kbo-Inn-Salzach-Klinikum, Wasserburg am Inn, Deutschland.
Stephen KaendlerPraxis Kaendler & Wurtz, Offenbach, Deutschland.
Matthias ElstnerKlinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Ansbach, Ansbach, Deutschland.
Andrea DreßingKlinik für Neurologie und Neurophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Joseph ClaßenKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Andreas MeiselCentrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin und Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Deutschland.
Armin GrauNeurologische Klinik, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Mitglieder Kommission Nachsorge der Deutschen Schlaganfall-Gesellschaft
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEInn-Salzach-Klinikum · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrrespective of the great impact stroke exerts on the society as a whole and far-reaching advances in acute treatment and rehabilitation of stroke, so far outpatient services for post-stroke care have not been established on a national level in Germany. OBJECTIVE AND

methodsAgainst the background of this contemporary lack of care, in May 2020 the German Stroke Society (DSG) established the stroke aftercare commission. This position paper discusses structural models of future services addressing outpatient post-stroke care. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The specialized care by a neurologist should be central to a multidisciplinary, interprofessional and transsectoral treatment. Structural concepts of post-stroke care must take regional differences but also effective strategies for quality control into account. Certification processes and appropriate financing of follow-up registries at state and federal levels may pave the way for improvement over the medium term. Structured outpatient post-stroke care services should be open to all subgroups of stroke patients. Additionally, innovative technologies can make an important contribution to post-stroke care; however, the implementation of specialized services demands adequate funding as well as separate financial incentives for the providers. The solution must carefully balance the advantages and disadvantages of the specific care and financing models. Currently the discussion of new models of post-stroke care is gaining new momentum, which opens up perspectives for the advancement of the otherwise still insufficient contemporary care structures.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAftercareAmbulatory CareGermanyHumansFinancingPerspectivesRequirementsStrokeStructural care models

Identifiers

PMID34932127
PMCPMC9010383
OpenAlexW4200574628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.