ArticlemBio2021
Single-Cell Time-Lapse Observation Reveals Cell Shrinkage upon Cell Death in Batch Culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- In situ detection of dead cells from live cells via a DC plus low frequency AC resistive pulse sensor.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Article
- Automated cell properties toolbox from 3D bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds via deep learning and optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Sub-zero non-freezing of vascularized composite allografts in a rodent partial hindlimb model.Cryobiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a model organism for aging and longevity studies. In a clonal population of S. cerevisiae, the timing of cell death in the stationary phase is not synchronized, indicating that heterogeneity exists in survival at a single-cell level. Heterogeneity also exists in the cell size, and its correlation with the death rate has been discussed in past studies. However, the direct cause of the heterogeneity in survival remains unknown. In this report, we revisited this question and asked whether the death rate has any correlation with cell size. Past studies did not exclude a possibility that cells change their size upon or after death. If such a change exists, the size dependence of cell death could be misinterpreted. Therefore, we analyzed the correlation between the death rate and cell size before death by time-lapse imaging. It turned out that the size dependence of the death rate varied from one strain to another, suggesting that general principles between cell size and death do not exist. Instead, cells shrink upon cell death, resulting in the accumulation of small dead cells. The degree of cell shrinkage was proportional to the cell size, and the ratio was constant in two strains, which is between 25 and 28%, suggesting the presence of general principles and mechanisms behind the shrinkage event upon cell death. Further investigation of the cause and mechanism of the shrinkage will help us to understand the process of cell death and the origin of the heterogeneity in survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.