Evidence mapPaperPMID 34939921Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2022

Pulmonary Function Tests for the Prediction of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications.

André Dankert, Thorsten Dohrmann, Benjamin Löser, Antonia Zapf, Christian Zöllner, Martin Petzoldt

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05812365 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Best End-Expiratory and Driving-Pressure for Individualized Flow Controlled Ventilation in Patients With COPD - an Observational Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2024 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsCOPD, Ventilator Lung, Anesthesia
NCT07063277 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of the Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI) and Spirometry Tests in Predicting Postoperative Respiratory Complications in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara Bilkent Sehir HastanesiRan2025 to 2026Enrolled142ConditionsCoronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationArmsPreoperative Evaluation with ORI and Spirometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. PPCRKB: a risk factor knowledge base of postoperative pulmonary complications.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

André DankertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medicine Rostock; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Thorsten Dohrmann
Benjamin Löser
Antonia Zapf
Christian Zöllner
Martin Petzoldt
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary function tests (PFTs) such as spirometry and blood gas analysis have been claimed to improve preoperative risk assessment. This systematic review summarizes the available scientific literature regarding the ability of PFTs to predict postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) in non-thoracic surgery.

methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library for pertinent original research articles (PROSPERO CRD42020215502), framed by the PIT-criteria (PIT, participants, index test, target conditions), respecting the PRISMA-DTA recommendations (DTA, diagnostic test accuracy).

results46 original research studies were identified that used PFT-findings as index tests and PPC as target condition. QUADAS-2 quality assessment revealed a high risk of bias regarding patient selection, blinding, and outcome definitions. Qualitative synthesis of prospective studies revealed inconclusive study findings: 65% argue for and 35% against preoperative spirometry, and 43% argue for blood gas analysis. A (post-hoc) subgroup analysis in prospective studies with low-risk of selection bias identified a possible benefit in upper abdominal surgery (three studies with 959 participants argued for and one study with 60 participants against spirometry).

conclusionAs the existing literature is inconclusive it is currently unknown if PFTs improve risk assessment before non-thoracic surgery. Spirometry should be considered in individuals with key indicators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) scheduling for upper abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID34939921
PMCPMC9131183
OpenAlexW4200076625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.