ArticleBiosensors2021
Lateral Flow Immunoassay of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen with SERS-Based Registration: Development and Comparison with Traditional Immunoassays.
Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances on Sensors and Diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2 Biomarkers.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Rapid Diagnosis of Viral Diseases.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Review
- Au@Pt@Pd nanozymes based lateral flow immunoassay for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in nasal swab samples.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Pushing the Limits of Lateral Flow Immunoassay by Digital SERS for the Ultralow Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus.Small science · 2024Article
- Article
- Digital Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy-Lateral Flow Test Dipstick: Ultrasensitive, Rapid Virus Quantification in Environmental Dust.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Pen direct writing of SERRS-based lateral flow assays for detection of penicillin G in milk.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Advances in nanobiosensors during the COVID-19 pandemic and future perspectives for the post-COVID era.Nano convergence · 2024Review
- Development of a nucleic acid-based lateral flow device as a reliable diagnostic tool for respiratory viral infections.MethodsX · 2023Article
- Raman-Based Techniques in Medical Applications for Diagnostic Tasks: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection rapid diagnostic test using SERS-based lateral flow immunoassay.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Carbon-based nanomaterials against SARS-CoV-2: Therapeutic and diagnostic applications.OpenNano · 2023Article
- Lateral Flow Immunoassays for Detecting Viral Infectious Antigens and Antibodies.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Fundamentals of SARS-CoV-2 Biosensors.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Development and evaluation of time-resolved fluorescent immunochromatographic assay for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Current Advances in Paper-Based Biosensor Technologies for Rapid COVID-19 Diagnosis.Biochip journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased the demand for pathogen detection methods that combine low detection limits with rapid results. Despite the significant progress in methods and devices for nucleic acid amplification, immunochemical methods are still preferred for mass testing without specialized laboratories and highly qualified personnel. The most widely used immunoassays are microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with photometric detection and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) with visual results assessment. However, the disadvantage of ELISA is its considerable duration, and that of LFIA is its low sensitivity. In this study, the modified LFIA of a specific antigen of the causative agent of COVID-19, spike receptor-binding domain, was developed and characterized. This modified LFIA includes the use of gold nanoparticles with immobilized antibodies and 4-mercaptobenzoic acid as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanotag and registration of the nanotag binding by SERS spectrometry. To enhance the sensitivity of LFIA-SERS analysis, we determined the optimal compositions of SERS nanotags and membranes used in LFIA. For benchmark comparison, ELISA and conventional colorimetric LFIA were used with the same immune reagents. The proposed method combines a low detection limit of 0.1 ng/mL (at 0.4 ng/mL for ELISA and 1 ng/mL for qualitative LFIA) with a short assay time equal to 20 min (at 3.5 h for ELISA and 15 min for LFIA). The results obtained demonstrate the promise of using the SERS effects in membrane immuno-analytical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.