Evidence mapPaperPMID 34940374Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Back to the Cradle of Cytotherapy: Integrating a Century of Clinical Research and Biotechnology-Based Manufacturing for Modern Tissue-Specific Cellular Treatments in Switzerland.

Alexis Laurent, Philippe Abdel-Sayed, Corinne Scaletta, Philippe Laurent, Elénie Laurent, Murielle Michetti, Anthony de Buys Roessingh, Wassim Raffoul, Nathalie Hirt-Burri, Lee Ann Applegate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexis LaurentRegenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
Philippe Abdel-SayedRegenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6054-0573
Corinne ScalettaRegenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
Philippe LaurentSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland.
Elénie LaurentPrivate Practice, Pharmacie du Gros-de-Vaud SA, 1038 Bercher, Switzerland.
Murielle MichettiRegenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
Anthony de Buys RoessinghChildren and Adolescent Surgery Service, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2174-4549
Wassim RaffoulFaculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-0077
Nathalie Hirt-BurriRegenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.
Lee Ann ApplegateRegenerative Therapy Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7346-9921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empirically studied by Dr. Brown-Séquard in the late 1800s, cytotherapies were later democratized by Dr. Niehans during the twentieth century in Western Switzerland. Many local cultural landmarks around the Léman Riviera are reminiscent of the inception of such cell-based treatments. Despite the discreet extravagance of the remaining heirs of "living cell therapy" and specific enforcements by Swiss health authorities, current interest in modern and scientifically sound cell-based regenerative medicine has never been stronger. Respective progress made in bioengineering and in biotechnology have enabled the clinical implementation of modern cell-based therapeutic treatments within updated medical and regulatory frameworks. Notably, the Swiss progenitor cell transplantation program has enabled the gathering of two decades of clinical experience in Lausanne for the therapeutic management of cutaneous and musculoskeletal affections, using homologous allogeneic cell-based approaches. While striking conceptual similarities exist between the respective works of the fathers of cytotherapy and of modern highly specialized clinicians, major and important iterative updates have been implemented, centered on product quality and risk-analysis-based patient safety insurance. This perspective article highlights some historical similarities and major evolutive differences, particularly regarding product safety and quality issues, characterizing the use of cell-based therapies in Switzerland over the past century. We outline the vast therapeutic potential to be harnessed for the benefit of overall patient health and the importance of specific scientific methodological aspects.

Indexed as

biotechnological manufacturingcell bankingcell therapycellular extractsliving cell therapyprimary progenitor cellsquality requirementsregenerative medicinetherapeutic productstransplantation program

Identifiers

PMID34940374
PMCPMC8698568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.