ArticleJournal of applied genetics2022
Analytical and numerical comparisons of two methods of estimation of additive × additive × additive interaction of QTL effects.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic Characters and Inheritance Tendency of Agronomic Traits in F1 Progeny of Pear.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quantifying Genetic Parameters for Blackleg Resistance in Rapeseed: A Comparative Study.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The use of weighted multiple linear regression to estimate QTL × QTL × QTL interaction effects of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) doubled-haploid lines.Journal of applied genetics · 2023Article
- A Comparison of Methods to Estimate Additive-by-Additive-by-Additive of QTL×QTL×QTL Interaction Effects by Monte Carlo Simulation Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents the analytical and numerical comparison of two methods of estimation of additive × additive × additive (aaa) interaction of QTL effects. The first method takes into account only the plant phenotype, while in the second we also included genotypic information from molecular marker observation. Analysis was made on 150 doubled haploid (DH) lines of barley derived from cross Steptoe × Morex and 145 DH lines from Harrington × TR306 cross. In total, 153 sets of observation was analyzed. In most cases, aaa interactions were found with an exert effect on QTL. Results also show that with molecular marker observations, obtained estimators had smaller absolute values than phenotypic estimators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.