Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34943803›Full record

ReviewCells2021

The Effective Combination between 3D Cancer Models and Stimuli-Responsive Nanoscale Drug Delivery Systems.

Federica Foglietta, Loredana Serpe, Roberto Canaparo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Psychobiotic Properties ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federica FogliettaDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 13, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7784-3629
Loredana SerpeDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 13, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-0322
Roberto CanaparoDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 13, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-6817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stimuli-responsive drug-delivery systems (DDSs) have emerged as a potential tool for applications in healthcare, mainly in the treatment of cancer where versatile nanocarriers are co-triggered by endogenous and exogenous stimuli. Two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures are the most important in vitro model used to evaluate the anticancer activity of these stimuli-responsive DDSs due to their easy manipulation and versatility. However, some limitations suggest that these in vitro models poorly predict the outcome of in vivo studies. One of the main drawbacks of 2D cell cultures is their inadequate representation of the 3D environment's physiological complexity, which sees cells interact with each other and the extracellular matrix (ECM) according to their specific cellular organization. In this regard, 3D cancer models are a promising approach that can overcome the main shortcomings of 2D cancer cell cultures, as these in vitro models possess many peculiarities by which they mimic in vivo tumors, including physiologically relevant cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions. This is, in our opinion, even more relevant when a stimuli-responsive DDS is being investigated. In this review, we therefore report and discuss endogenous and exogenous stimuli-responsive DDSs whose effectiveness has been tested using 3D cancer cell cultures.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansMagnetic FieldsNanoparticlesNeoplasmsReactive Oxygen SpeciesReactive Oxygen Speciesdrug delivery systems (DDSs)endogenous stimuli-responsive DDSsexogenous stimuli-responsive DDSsthree-dimensional (3D) cancer models

Identifiers

PMID34943803
PMCPMC8699241

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.