Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944774›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Prognostic Value of Routinely Measured Inflammatory Biomarkers in Older Cancer Patients: Pooled Analysis of Three Cohorts.

Nadia Oubaya, Pierre Soubeyran, Nicoleta Reinald, Marianne Fonck, Mylène Allain, Sonia Zebachi, Damien Heitz, Marie Laurent, Cécile Delattre, Philippe Caillet and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nadia OubayaUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6565-9741
Pierre SoubeyranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, University of Bordeaux, Inserm U1218, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-7299
Nicoleta ReinaldUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Marianne FonckDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, University of Bordeaux, Inserm U1218, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Mylène AllainUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Sonia ZebachiUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Damien HeitzOncology and Hematology Unit, Strasbourg University Hospital, Hautepierre Hospital, F-67200 Strasbourg, France.
Marie LaurentUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Cécile DelattreSupportive Care Unit, Institut de Cancérologie of Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, F-54500 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.
Philippe CailletUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Jérôme DaubaDepartment of Oncology, Dax Hospital, F-40100 Dax, France.
Sylvie Bastuji-GarinUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Gilles AlbrandDepartment of Geriatrics, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, F-69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.
Michael BringuierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France.
Muriel RainfrayDepartment of Geriatrics, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Etienne BrainDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0881-9371
Thomas GrelletyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, University of Bordeaux, Inserm U1218, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Elena PaillaudUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5579-9927
Simone Mathoulin-PélissierEpicene Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, INSERM, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Carine BelleraEpicene Team, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University Bordeaux, INSERM, UMR 1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-4671
Florence Canouï-PoitrineUniversity Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic assessment of older cancer patients is complicated by their heterogeneity. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of routine inflammatory biomarkers.

methodsA pooled analysis of prospective multicenter cohorts of cancer patients aged ≥70 was performed. We measured CRP and albumin, and calculated Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and CRP/albumin ratio. The GPS has three levels (0 = CRP ≤ 10 mg/L, albumin ≥ 35 g/L, i.e., normal values; 1 = one abnormal value; 2 = two abnormal values). One-year mortality was assessed using Cox models. Discriminative power was assessed using Harrell's C index (C) and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

resultsOverall, 1800 patients were analyzed (mean age: 79 ± 6; males: 62%; metastases: 38%). The GPS and CRP/albumin ratio were independently associated with mortality in patients not at risk of frailty (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 4.48 [2.03-9.89] for GPS1, 11.64 [4.54-29.81] for GPS2, and 7.15 [3.22-15.90] for CRP/albumin ratio > 0.215) and in patients at risk of frailty (2.45 [1.79-3.34] for GPS1, 3.97 [2.93-5.37] for GPS2, and 2.81 [2.17-3.65] for CRP/albumin ratio > 0.215). The discriminative power of the baseline clinical model (C = 0.82 [0.80-0.83]) was increased by adding GPS (C = 0.84 [0.82-0.85]; NRI events (NRI+) = 10% [2-16]) and CRP/albumin ratio (C = 0.83 [0.82-0.85]; NRI+ = 14% [2-17]).

conclusionsRoutine inflammatory biomarkers add prognostic value to clinical factors in older cancer patients.

Indexed as

biomarkerscancermortalityolder patients

Identifiers

PMID34944774
PMCPMC8699299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.