Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34944836›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Interplay between Genome, Metabolome and Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer.

Koldo Garcia-Etxebarria, Marc Clos-Garcia, Oiana Telleria, Beatriz Nafría, Cristina Alonso, Marta Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta, Andre Franke, Anais Crespo, Agueda Iglesias, Joaquín Cubiella and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the Complex Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia Using Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Koldo Garcia-EtxebarriaGrupo de Genética Gastrointestinal, Biodonostia, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-9416
Marc Clos-GarciaExosomes Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Cooperativa en Biociencias (CIC bioGUNE), 48160 Derio, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-1372
Oiana TelleriaExosomes Laboratory, Centro de Investigación Cooperativa en Biociencias (CIC bioGUNE), 48160 Derio, Spain.
Beatriz NafríaGrupo de Enfermedades Gastrointestinales, Biodonostia, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4698-5680
Cristina AlonsoOWL Metabolomics, Bizkaia Technology Park, 48160 Derio, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-678X
Marta Iruarrizaga-LejarretaOWL Metabolomics, Bizkaia Technology Park, 48160 Derio, Spain.
Andre FrankeInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Anais CrespoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitario Galicia Sur, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, 32005 Ourense, Spain.
Agueda IglesiasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitario Galicia Sur, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, 32005 Ourense, Spain.
Joaquín CubiellaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-4831
Luis BujandaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Manuel Falcón-PérezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3133-0670
University of the Basque Country · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESEuskadiko Parke Teknologikoa · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DECIC bioGUNE · ESIkerbasque · ES

Funding

Basque Government KK- 2016/00026Instituto de Salud Carlos III DTS19/00160Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI12/01604Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/00837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC), a major health concern, is developed depending on environmental, genetic and microbial factors. The microbiome and metabolome have been analyzed to study their role in CRC. However, the interplay of host genetics with those layers in CRC remains unclear.

methods120 individuals were sequenced and association analyses were carried out for adenoma and CRC risk, and for selected components of the microbiome and metabolome. The epistasis between genes located in cholesterol pathways was analyzed; modifiable risk factors were studied using Mendelian randomization; and the three omic layers were used to integrate their data and to build risk prediction models.

resultsWe detected genetic variants that were associated to components of metabolome or microbiome and adenoma or CRC risk (e.g., in

conclusionsThe use of the three omic layers allowed for the finding of biological mechanisms related to the development of adenoma and CRC, and each layer provided complementary information to build risk prediction models.

Indexed as

adenomacolorectal cancerhost genomemetabolomemicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID34944836
PMCPMC8699218
OpenAlexW4200130396

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.