Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948144›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Bio-Scaffolds as Cell or Exosome Carriers for Nerve Injury Repair.

Raju Poongodi, Ying-Lun Chen, Tao-Hsiang Yang, Ya-Hsien Huang, Kuender D Yang, Hsin-Chieh Lin, Jen-Kun Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Innovative Strategies in 3D Bioprinting for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raju PoongodiDepartment of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6050-2091
Ying-Lun ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.
Tao-Hsiang YangDepartment of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.
Ya-Hsien HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.
Kuender D YangInstitute of Biomedical Science, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City 25245, Taiwan.
Hsin-Chieh LinDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.
Jen-Kun ChengDepartment of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10449, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-7856

Funding

Mackay Memorial Hospital MMH-E-107-05Mackay Memorial Hospital MMH-E-110-15, MMH-E-111-12Ministry of Science and Technology 108-2314-B-195-006-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology 110-2811-B-195-500Ministry of Science and Technology 110-2811-B-195-501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central and peripheral nerve injuries can lead to permanent paralysis and organ dysfunction. In recent years, many cell and exosome implantation techniques have been developed in an attempt to restore function after nerve injury with promising but generally unsatisfactory clinical results. Clinical outcome may be enhanced by bio-scaffolds specifically fabricated to provide the appropriate three-dimensional (3D) conduit, growth-permissive substrate, and trophic factor support required for cell survival and regeneration. In rodents, these scaffolds have been shown to promote axonal regrowth and restore limb motor function following experimental spinal cord or sciatic nerve injury. Combining the appropriate cell/exosome and scaffold type may thus achieve tissue repair and regeneration with safety and efficacy sufficient for routine clinical application. In this review, we describe the efficacies of bio-scaffolds composed of various natural polysaccharides (alginate, chitin, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid), protein polymers (gelatin, collagen, silk fibroin, fibrin, and keratin), and self-assembling peptides for repair of nerve injury. In addition, we review the capacities of these constructs for supporting in vitro cell-adhesion, mechano-transduction, proliferation, and differentiation as well as the in vivo properties critical for a successful clinical outcome, including controlled degradation and re-absorption. Finally, we describe recent advances in 3D bio-printing for nerve regeneration.

Indexed as

AxonsPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPrinting, Three-DimensionalSciatic NerveAnimalsExosomesHumansTissue Scaffoldsbiomaterialbio-scaffoldexosomemotor functionnatural polymernerve injurynerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID34948144
PMCPMC8707664

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.