Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948608›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Glucose Concentrations from Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices Compared to Those from Blood Plasma during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Healthy Young Adults.

Thomas G Kontou, Charli Sargent, Gregory D Roach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas G KontouThe Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, P.O. Box 42, Adelaide 5034, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9305-4432
Charli SargentThe Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, P.O. Box 42, Adelaide 5034, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5340-4701
Gregory D RoachThe Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, P.O. Box 42, Adelaide 5034, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-1243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring devices measure glucose in interstitial fluid. The devices are effective when used by patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes but are increasingly being used by researchers who are interested in the effects of various behaviours of glucose concentrations in healthy participants. Despite their more frequent application in this setting, the devices have not yet been validated for use under such conditions. A total of 124 healthy participants were recruited to a ten-day laboratory study. Each participant underwent four oral glucose tolerance tests, and a total of 3315 out of a possible 4960 paired samples were included in the final analysis. Bland-Altman plots and mean absolute relative differences were used to determine the agreement between the two methods. Bland-Altman analyses revealed that the continuous glucose monitoring devices had proportional bias (

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPlasmaYoung AdultBlood Glucoseblood glucosecontinuous blood glucose monitoringhealthy participants

Identifiers

PMID34948608
PMCPMC8701485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.