Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34948652›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Metabolic Syndrome and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: An Overview of Exposure and Health Effects.

Elsi Haverinen, Mariana F Fernandez, Vicente Mustieles, Hanna Tolonen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elsi HaverinenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), 00300 Helsinki, Finland.
Mariana F FernandezDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-8914
Vicente MustielesDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2010-5438
Hanna TolonenDepartment of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), 00300 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-4303
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is causing a significant health burden among the European population. Current knowledge supports the notion that endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) interfere with human metabolism and hormonal balance, contributing to the conventionally recognized lifestyle-related MetS risk factors. This review aims to identify epidemiological studies focusing on the association between MetS or its individual components (e.g., obesity, insulin resistance, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension) and eight HBM4EU priority substances (bisphenol A (BPA), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), phthalates, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides and heavy metals (cadmium, arsenic and mercury)). Thus far, human biomonitoring (HBM) studies have presented evidence supporting the role of EDC exposures on the development of individual MetS components. The strength of the association varies between the components and EDCs. Current evidence on metabolic disturbances and EDCs is still limited and heterogeneous, and mainly represent studies from North America and Asia, highlighting the need for well-conducted and harmonized HBM programmes among the European population. Rigorous and ongoing HBM in combination with health monitoring can help to identify the most concerning EDC exposures, to guide future risk assessment and policy actions.

Indexed as

ArsenicEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsMetabolic SyndromePesticidesBiological MonitoringEnvironmental ExposureHumansArsenicEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsPesticidesdiabetesdyslipidemiaendocrine disrupting chemicalsHBM4EUhuman biomonitoringhypertensioninsulin resistancemetabolic syndromeobesity

Identifiers

PMID34948652
PMCPMC8701112
OpenAlexW4200445881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.