ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021
Swimming Phase-Based Performance Evaluation Using a Single IMU in Main Swimming Techniques.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upper-Body Pitch Control Differentiates Sprint Butterfly Performance in Youth Swimmers: An IMU-Based Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Analysis of the Breaststroke Kick in Young Swimmers Using Wearable Inertial Sensors: An Exploratory Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Onshore human swimming motion measurement and dynamic analysis using wearable inertial sensors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Trunk rotation coordination in front crawl: which segment leads? Three coordination strategies and their dynamic changes across 400-m split progression in elite swimmers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Associations Between the Swimming Speed, Anthropometrics, Kinematics, and Kinetics in the Butterfly Stroke.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Contemporary advances in polymer applications for sporting goods: fundamentals, properties, and applications.RSC advances · 2024Review
- Swimtrans Net: a multimodal robotic system for swimming action recognition driven via Swin-Transformer.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
- Validation of Automatically Quantified Swim Stroke Mechanics Using an Inertial Measurement Unit in Paralympic Athletes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using Statistical Parametric Mapping to Compare the Propulsion of Age-Group Swimmers in Front Crawl Acquired with the Aquanex System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ubiquitous Computing in Sports and Physical Activity-Recent Trends and Developments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Focused Review on the Flexible Wearable Sensors for Sports: From Kinematics to Physiologies.Micromachines · 2022Review
- SmartSwim, a Novel IMU-Based Coaching Assistance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Monitoring weekly progress of front crawl swimmers using IMU-based performance evaluation goal metrics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive monitoring of performance is essential for swimmers and swimming coaches to optimize the training. Regardless of the swimming technique, the swimmer passes various swimming phases from wall to wall, including a dive into the water or wall push-off, then glide and strokes preparation and finally, swimming up to the turn. The coach focuses on improving the performance of the swimmer in each of these phases. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of using a sacrum-worn inertial measurement unit (IMU) for performance evaluation in each swimming phase (wall push-off, glide, stroke preparation and swimming) of elite swimmers in four main swimming techniques (i.e. front crawl, breaststroke, butterfly and backstroke). Nineteen swimmers were asked to wear a sacrum IMU and swim four one-way 25 m trials in each technique, attached to a tethered speedometer and filmed by cameras in the whole lap as reference systems. Based on the literature, several goal metrics were extracted from the instantaneous velocity (e.g. average velocity per stroke cycle) and displacement (e.g. time to reach 15 m from the wall) data from a tethered speedometer for the swimming phases, each one representing the goodness of swimmer's performance. Following a novel approach, that starts from swimming bout detection and continues until detecting the swimming phases, the IMU kinematic variables in each swimming phase were extracted. The highly associated variables with the corresponding goal metrics were detected by LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) variable selection and used for estimating the goal metrics with a linear regression model. The selected kinematic variables were relevant to the motion characteristics of each phase (e.g. selection of propulsion-related variables in wall push-off phase), providing more interpretability to the model. The estimation reached a determination coefficient (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.