ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2021
ErbB inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy for triple-positive breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategy for HR+/HER2 + breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Potential Drug Synergy Through the ERBB2 Pathway in HER2+ Breast Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- ERBB2 Targeting Reveals a Significant Suppression of Tumorigenesis in Murine Endometrial Cancer with Pten Mutation.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Article
- A pilot trial of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab, dalpiciclib, and letrozole for triple-positive breast cancer.MedComm · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Dual Anti-HER2 Blockade and Docetaxel With or Without Carboplatin as Neoadjuvant Regimen for Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on the effectiveness of ErbB inhibitor interventions for women with triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) is scarce. Exposure to hormone receptors was reported to eclipse targeted intervention effectiveness. Here, we aimed to explore the optimum targeted regimen for TPBC.
methodsWe conducted a thorough search of the literature focusing on neoadjuvant targeted therapy with both hormone receptor-positive and HER2 (ErbB2)-positive patients and performed a network meta-analysis comparing the regimens using a random-effects model. The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0/is) was the primary outcome. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association among twelve regimens.
resultsThirteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Significantly more TPBC patients receiving ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus lapatinib experienced pCR events than other patients. In the high-performance ranking of the twelve regimens, ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus lapatinib (TDM-1+L) ranked top, followed by ado-trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1), trastuzumab plus carboplatin, taxanes and pertuzumab (TCHP), trastuzumab plus docetaxel and lapatinib (THL), trastuzumab, taxanes and pertuzumab (THP), ado-trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab (TDM1+P), trastuzumab plus taxanes (TH), trastuzumab plus taxanes and neratinib, taxanes plus pertuzumab (HP), taxanes and neratinib (HN), trastuzumab plus lapatinib (TL), trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (TP) in sequence.
conclusionDouble-targeted therapy in chemotherapy-based regimens was associated with better pCR than single-targeted therapy, and TDM-1+L stood out. For either single-targeted or double-targeted therapies, regimens free of chemotherapy were always worse than those with targeted therapy. Our data support guidelines that recommend combinations of chemotherapies plus targeted therapies in the neoadjuvant setting for early TPBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34956441PMC8661156What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.