ArticleHeart rhythm2022
Use of machine learning to classify high-risk variants of uncertain significance in lamin A/C cardiac disease.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01192048 (Genetic Testing of Individuals and Families With Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genetic Testing of Individuals and Families With Congenital Heart Disease
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric heart failure in the era of cardio-immunology: inflammatory-immune context phenotypes, diagnosis, and targeted management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Genetics of Congenital Heart Disease.Clinics in perinatology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Cardiomyopathies: Implications for Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- How Functional Genomics Can Keep Pace With VUS Identification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVariation in lamin A/C results in a spectrum of clinical disease, including arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy. Benign variation is rare, and classification of LMNA missense variants via in silico prediction tools results in a high rate of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs).
objectiveThe goal of this study was to use a machine learning (ML) approach for in silico prediction of LMNA pathogenic variation.
methodsGenetic sequencing was performed on family members with conduction system disease, and patient cell lines were examined for LMNA expression. In silico predictions of conservation and pathogenicity of published LMNA variants were visualized with uniform manifold approximation and projection. K-means clustering was used to identify variant groups with similarly projected scores, allowing the generation of statistically supported risk categories.
resultsWe discovered a novel LMNA variant (c.408C>A:p.Asp136Glu) segregating with conduction system disease in a multigeneration pedigree, which was reported as a VUS by a commercial testing company. Additional familial analysis and in vitro testing found it to be pathogenic, which prompted the development of an ML algorithm that used in silico predictions of pathogenicity for known LMNA missense variants. This identified 3 clusters of variation, each with a significantly different incidence of known pathogenic variants (38.8%, 15.0%, and 6.1%). Three hundred thirty-nine of 415 head/rod domain variants (81.7%), including p.Asp136Glu, were in clusters with highest proportions of pathogenic variants.
conclusionAn unsupervised ML method successfully identified clusters enriched for pathogenic LMNA variants including a novel variant associated with conduction system disease. Our ML method may assist in identifying high-risk VUS when familial testing is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.