Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964847›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2022

13. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06345118 (Evaluate the Results of Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 109 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06345118 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluate the Results of Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Geriatric HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fall, Elderly PatientArmsOtago exercise program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · 2025 to 2025
$660k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG069080NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060756NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063391NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusEndocrinologyAgedHumansReference StandardsSocieties, MedicalStandard of Care

Identifiers

PMID34964847
PMCPMC8935395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.