Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964900›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2022

Mitochondria as environments for the nuclear genome in Drosophila: mitonuclear G×G×E.

David M Rand, James A Mossman, Adam N Spierer, John A Santiago

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David M RandDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6817-3459
James A MossmanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Adam N SpiererDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
John A SantiagoDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cellular Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.
Brown University · US

Funding

Nuclear-Mitochondrial Fitness Interactions in DrosophilaR01GM067862 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAND, DAVID M · 2004 to 2020
$5.1M
Predoctoral Training in the Molecular Biology of AgingT32AG041688 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI NICOLA NERETTI, John M Sedivy · 2012 to 2026
$3.5M
Mitonuclear genetics of complex traits in DrosophilaR35GM139607 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI RAND, DAVID M · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG041688NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067862NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139607NIH HHS 1R35GM139607NIH HHS 2R01GM067862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondria evolved from a union of microbial cells belonging to distinct lineages that were likely anaerobic. The evolution of eukaryotes required a massive reorganization of the 2 genomes and eventual adaptation to aerobic environments. The nutrients and oxygen that sustain eukaryotic metabolism today are processed in mitochondria through coordinated expression of 37 mitochondrial genes and over 1000 nuclear genes. This puts mitochondria at the nexus of gene-by-gene (G×G) and gene-by-environment (G×E) interactions that sustain life. Here we use a Drosophila model of mitonuclear genetic interactions to explore the notion that mitochondria are environments for the nuclear genome, and vice versa. We construct factorial combinations of mtDNA and nuclear chromosomes to test for epistatic interactions (G×G), and expose these mitonuclear genotypes to altered dietary environments to examine G×E interactions. We use development time and genome-wide RNAseq analyses to assess the relative contributions of mtDNA, nuclear chromosomes, and environmental effects on these traits (mitonuclear G×G×E). We show that the nuclear transcriptional response to alternative mitochondrial "environments" (G×G) has significant overlap with the transcriptional response of mitonuclear genotypes to altered dietary environments. These analyses point to specific transcription factors (e.g., giant) that mediated these interactions, and identified coexpressed modules of genes that may account for the overlap in differentially expressed genes. Roughly 20% of the transcriptome includes G×G genes that are concordant with G×E genes, suggesting that mitonuclear interactions are part of an organism's environment.

Indexed as

DrosophilaGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsCell NucleusDNA, MitochondrialEpistasis, GeneticMitochondriaDNA, Mitochondrialcoevolutionepistasisgene expression module

Identifiers

PMID34964900
PMCPMC8851671
OpenAlexW4200396637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.