Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969693›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2021

Sex differences over time for glycemic control, pump use and insulin dose in patients aged 10-40 years with type 1 diabetes: a diabetes registry study.

Claudia Boettcher, Sascha R Tittel, Thomas Meissner, Bettina Gohlke, Rainer Stachow, Axel Dost, Sybille Wunderlich, Iris Lowak, Stefanie Lanzinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia BoettcherPaediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University of Bern Faculty of Medicine, Bern, Switzerland claudia.boettcher@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-5494-2616
Sascha R TittelInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (ZIBMT), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas MeissnerDepartment of General Paediatrics, Neonatology and Paediatric Cardiology, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bettina GohlkePaediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rainer StachowSylt Specialist Clinic for Children and Adolescents, Westerland, Germany.
Axel DostDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sybille WunderlichClinic for Internal Medicine-Diabetology and Angiology Mitte, DRK Hospitals Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Iris LowakDiabetes Centre Forchheim, Forchheim, Germany.
Stefanie LanzingerInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry (ZIBMT), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEDRK Kliniken Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEGerman Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology · DEGerman Diabetes Center Mergentheim · DEJena University Hospital · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate sex differences in people with type 1 diabetes concerning changes in glycemic control and trends in insulin pump use and insulin dose over two decades in adolescents and one-and-a-half decades in adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsPeople aged 10-20 years (data years 1999-2018) and 21-40 years (data years 2004-2018) with type 1 diabetes were identified in the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV). All available patients' data sets of the respective period were used for linear regression analyses to investigate trends in HbA1c, pump use, insulin doses and body mass index SD scores (BMI-SDS) in females and males. In addition, stratification by migrant background was made for the adolescent group.

resultsIn the youth group (n=68 662), both boys and girls showed an HbA1c decrease over the period examined. After stratification for migrant background, an HbA1c convergence between boys and girls was seen in those without migrant background as of 2016. Usage of insulin pumps increased continuously from 3% (boys and girls) to 47% (boys) and 54% (girls), respectively. The daily insulin dose in units per kilogram body weight and day increased continuously from 1999 to 2018. An insulin dose leveling between boys and girls occurred. BMI-SDS consistently increased in girls whereas only slight variations were observed in boys.The adult group (n=15 380) showed constant HbA1c sex differences from 2004 to 2018 with lower HbA1c level in females. The use of insulin pump therapy rose from 18% to 35% (males) and 30% to 50% (females).

conclusionsThe gap in metabolic control between boys and girls with type 1 diabetes seems to close, but predominantly in adolescents without a migrant background. Improved HbA1c was associated with increased insulin pump use, especially in girls.In adult patients, sex differences in metabolic control and insulin pump use persist: women show constantly lower HbA1c values and higher insulin pump use.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1InsulinAdolescentAdultChildFemaleGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleProspective StudiesRegistriesSex CharacteristicsYoung AdultGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinadolescent medicineadultinsulinsex characteristics

Identifiers

PMID34969693
PMCPMC8718474
OpenAlexW4200432002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.