ArticleMuscle & nerve2022
Risk factors for lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07646379 (Effects of Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement With and Without Neural Flossing Technique on Pain, Disability, and Range of Motion in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement With and Without Neural Flossing Technique on Pain, Disability, and Range of Motion in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous magnesium and methocarbamol for acute pain crises in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective analysis.Headache · 2026Article
- Distinctive clinical features in biopsy-proven nerve large-arteriole vasculitis and microvasculitis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsRecently, our group found an association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) in Olmsted County, Minnesota; we found a higher risk (odds ratio [OR], 7.91) for developing LRPN in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients. However, the influence of other comorbidities and anthropomorphic variables was not studied.
methodsDemographic and clinical data from 59 LRPN patients and 177 age/sex-matched controls were extracted using the Rochester LRPN epidemiological study. Differences between groups were compared by chi-square/Fisher exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.
resultsFactors predictive of LRPN on univariate analysis were DM (OR, 7.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.11-15.21), dementia (OR, 6.36; 95% CI, 1.13-35.67), stroke (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.32-11.01), dyslipidemia (OR, 2.844; 95% CI, 1.53-5.27), comorbid autoimmune disorders (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.07-6.93), hypertension (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.2-4.13), obesity (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.11-3.8), body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.04-1.15), and weight (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.009-1.037). On multivariate logistic regression analysis only DM (OR, 8.03; 95% CI, 3.86-16.7), comorbid autoimmune disorders (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 1.45-14.7), stroke (OR, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.2-14.25), and BMI (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13) were risk factors for LRPN. DISCUSSION: DM is the strongest risk factor for the development of LRPN, followed by comorbid autoimmune disorders, stroke, and higher BMI. Altered metabolism and immune dysfunction seem to be the most influential factors in the development of LRPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.