Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34978718›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2022

Calcium supplementation during pregnancy and long-term offspring outcome: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Päivi Korhonen, Kati Tihtonen, Jaana Isojärvi, Riitta Ojala, Ulla Ashorn, Per Ashorn, Outi Tammela

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Päivi KorhonenDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1747-5526
Kati TihtonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Center for Child, Adolescent, and Maternal Health Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-979X
Jaana IsojärviLibrary, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Riitta OjalaDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3155-4001
Ulla AshornFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Center for Child, Adolescent, and Maternal Health Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1720-868X
Per AshornDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-2593
Outi TammelaDepartment of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7818-0406
Tampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization currently recommends calcium supplementation for pregnant women, especially those with low calcium intakes, to reduce the risk of hypertension and preeclampsia. We aimed to evaluate the effect of this intervention on selected offspring outcomes. A systematic search was conducted in 11 databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of maternal calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D during pregnancy on selected offspring cardiovascular, growth, and metabolic and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Screening of titles and abstracts of 3555 records and full texts of 31 records yielded six RCTs (nine reports, n = 1616). Forest plot analyses were performed if at least two studies presented comparable data on the same outcome. In one study (n = 591), high-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk of offspring high systolic blood pressure at 5-7 years of age (risk ratio = 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.90). The effects of the intervention on offspring growth, metabolic, and neurodevelopmental outcomes remain unknown because of conflicting or insufficient data. High risk of attrition bias decreased the quality of the evidence. Limited available data from RCTs do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that prenatal calcium supplementation influences offspring health outcomes beyond the newborn period.

Indexed as

CalciumVitamin D DeficiencyDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyVitamin DVitaminsCalciumVitamin DVitaminsblood pressurecalcium supplementationchildgrowthoffspringpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34978718
PMCPMC9304138
OpenAlexW4205262620

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.