Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34980598›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Sapanisertib plus Fulvestrant in Postmenopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer after Progression on Aromatase Inhibitor.

José Á García-Sáenz, Noelia Martínez-Jáñez, Ricardo Cubedo, Yolanda Jerez, Ainhara Lahuerta, Santiago González-Santiago, Nieves Ferrer, Manuel Ramos, Jose L Alonso-Romero, Antonio Antón and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cells · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

José Á García-SáenzMedical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6880-0301
Noelia Martínez-JáñezGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo CubedoGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda JerezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red CIBERONC-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-0747
Ainhara LahuertaGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.
Santiago González-SantiagoGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-0236
Nieves FerrerGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel RamosGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-8234
Jose L Alonso-RomeroGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8746-2096
Antonio AntónGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.
Eva CarrascoGEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2771-7197
Jingjing ChenTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, Massachusetts.
Rachel NeuwirthTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, Massachusetts.
Kevin GalinskyTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-0311-4938
Sylvie VincentTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7247-2467
E Jane LeonardTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, Massachusetts.
Dennis SlamonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Institute for Learning and Development · USCentro Oncológico de Galicia · ESGEICAM – Spanish Breast Cancer Group · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital San Pedro de Alcántara · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESOnkologikoa · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis phase II study investigated daily or weekly sapanisertib (a selective dual inhibitor of mTOR complexes 1 and 2) in combination with fulvestrant. PATIENTS AND

methodsPostmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer following progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment were randomized to receive fulvestrant 500 mg (28-day treatment cycles), fulvestrant plus sapanisertib 4 mg daily, or fulvestrant plus sapanisertib 30 mg weekly, until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or study completion.

resultsAmong 141 enrolled patients, baseline characteristics were balanced among treatment arms, including prior cyclin-dependent kinase-4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor treatment in 33% to 35% of patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) was 3.5 months in the single-agent fulvestrant arm, compared with 7.2 months for fulvestrant plus sapanisertib daily [HR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47-1.26] and 5.6 months for fulvestrant plus sapanisertib weekly (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.45). The greatest PFS benefits were seen in patients who had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and hyperglycemia, all occurring more frequently in the combination therapy arms. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred more frequently in the two combination therapy arms than with single-agent fulvestrant (32% and 36% vs. 4%, respectively).

conclusionsFulvestrant plus sapanisertib daily/weekly resulted in numerically longer PFS in patients with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer, compared with single-agent fulvestrant. The combination was associated with increased toxicity. Further development of sapanisertib using these dosing schedules in this setting is not supported by these data.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsAdenineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzoxazolesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFulvestrantHumansPostmenopausePyrazolesPyrimidinesReceptors, EstrogenAdenineAromatase InhibitorsBenzoxazolesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFulvestrantPyrazolesPyrimidinesReceptors, Estrogensapanisertib

Identifiers

PMID34980598
PMCPMC9365359
OpenAlexW4205830201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.