Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982572›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2022

Native Mass Spectrometry: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges.

Kelly R Karch, Dalton T Snyder, Sophie R Harvey, Vicki H Wysocki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly R KarchDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; email: wysocki.11@osu.edu.
Dalton T SnyderResource for Native Mass Spectrometry Guided Structural Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sophie R HarveyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; email: wysocki.11@osu.edu.
Vicki H WysockiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; email: wysocki.11@osu.edu.

Funding

Waters Select Series Cyclic IMS for P41 Native MS Resource Application to Alzheimer's DiseaseP41GM128577 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WYSOCKI, VICKI H. · 2018 to 2022
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM128577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native mass spectrometry (nMS) has emerged as an important tool in studying the structure and function of macromolecules and their complexes in the gas phase. In this review, we cover recent advances in nMS and related techniques including sample preparation, instrumentation, activation methods, and data analysis software. These advances have enabled nMS-based techniques to address a variety of challenging questions in structural biology. The second half of this review highlights recent applications of these technologies and surveys the classes of complexes that can be studied with nMS. Complementarity of nMS to existing structural biology techniques and current challenges in nMS are also addressed.

Indexed as

ProteinsMacromolecular SubstancesMass SpectrometryMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsion mobilitynative mass spectrometryprotein complexesstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID34982572
PMCPMC10700022

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.