Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34982714›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2022

An Interactive Voice Response System to Increase Physical Activity and Prevent Cancer in the Rural Alabama Black Belt: Design and Usability Study.

Mohanraj Thirumalai, Nashira Brown, Soumya Niranjan, Sh'Nese Townsend, Mary Anne Powell, Whitney Neal, Erica Schleicher, Venkatadri Raparla, Robert Oster, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohanraj ThirumalaiDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Birmingham at Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-3829
Nashira BrownDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Birmingham at Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-8928
Soumya NiranjanDepartment of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Birmingham at Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9477-9187
Sh'Nese TownsendDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1573-9206
Mary Anne PowellDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5205-7883
Whitney NealDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-3759
Erica SchleicherDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4051-0622
Venkatadri RaparlaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham/Lakeshore Research Collaborative, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0256-9685
Robert OsterDivision of Preventive Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2247-8596
Wendy Demark-WahnefriedDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Birmingham at Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-932X
Dori PekmeziDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-258X

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Lalita A. Shevde · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
UAB Pre-Doctoral Training Program in Obesity-Related ResearchT32HL105349 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2010 to 2026
$5.7M
Testing scalable, IVR-supported cancer prevention interventions in the rural Alabama Black BeltR01CA233550 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI PEKMEZI, DOROTHY W. · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233550NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL105349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased physical activity (PA) levels are associated with reduced risk and improved survival for several cancers; however, most Americans engage in less than the recommended levels of PA. Using interactive voice response (IVR) systems to provide personalized health education and counseling may represent a high-reach, low-cost strategy for addressing physical inactivity and cancer disparities in disproportionately burdened rural regions. However, there has been a paucity of research conducted in this area to date.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to design, develop, and test the usability of an IVR system aimed at increasing PA levels in the rural Alabama Black Belt.

methodsA pilot version of the IVR system was used to assess initial feasibility and acceptability. Detailed exit interviews were conducted to elicit participant feedback, which helped inform the development of a substantially upgraded in-house IVR system. This refined IVR system was then subjected to a sequential explanatory mixed methods evaluation. Participating rural county coordinators and research staff (N=10) tested the usability of the IVR system features for 2 weeks and then completed the System Usability Scale and qualitative semistructured interviews.

resultsThe study sample comprised mostly African American people, women, rural county coordinators, and research staff (N=10). Participants rated the IVR system with a mean score of 81 (SD 5) on the System Usability Scale, implying excellent usability. In total, 5 overarching themes emerged from the qualitative interviews: likes or dislikes of the intervention, barriers to or facilitators of PA, technical difficulties, quality of calls, and suggestions for intervention improvement. Message framing on step feedback, call completion incentives, and incremental goal-setting challenges were areas identified for improvement. The positive areas highlighted in the interviews included the personalized call schedules, flexibility to call in or receive a call, ability to make up for missed calls, narration, and PA tips.

conclusionsThe usability testing and feedback received from the rural county coordinators and research staff helped inform a final round of refinement to the IVR system before use in a large randomized controlled trial. This study stresses the importance of usability testing of all digital health interventions and the benefits it can offer to the intervention.

Indexed as

exerciseinteractive voice response systemsphysical activityrural healthtelehealthusability

Identifiers

PMID34982714
PMCPMC8767466

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.