ReviewBritish journal of cancer2022
Vessel co-option and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis: a continuum of tumour growth and spread?
Review in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of ZEB1 in angiogenesis and therapeutic potential (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Pericytes in hematogenous metastasis: mechanistic insights and therapeutic approaches.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- MCAM Expression Facilitates Melanoma-Endothelial Interactions and Promotes Metastatic Disease Progression.Experimental dermatology · 2025Article
- Review
- Integrated single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the tumor heterogeneity and microenvironment landscape during liver metastasis in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Manipulation of the crosstalk between tumor angiogenesis and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment: Insight into the combination therapy of anti-angiogenesis and immune checkpoint blockade.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Hematogenous metastasis and tumor dormancy as concepts or dogma? The continuum of vessel co-option and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis as an alternative.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two fields of cancer research have emerged dealing with the biology of tumour cells localised to the abluminal vascular surface: vessel co-option (VCo), a non-angiogenic mode of tumour growth and angiotropic extravascular migratory metastasis (EVMM), a non-hematogenous mode of tumour migration and metastasis. VCo is a mechanism by which tumour cells gain access to a blood supply by spreading along existing blood vessels in order to grow locally. Angiotropic EVMM involves "pericytic mimicry" (PM), which is characterised by tumour cells continuously migrating in the place of pericytes distantly along abluminal vascular surfaces. When cancer cells are engaged in PM and EVMM, they migrate along blood vessels beyond the advancing front of the tumour to secondary sites with the formation of regional and distant metastases. In the present perspective, the authors review the current scientific literature, emphasising the analogies between embryogenesis and cancer progression, the re-activation of embryonic signals by "cancer stem cells", and the important role of laminins and epithelial-mesenchymal-transition. This perspective maintains that VCo and angiotropic EVMM constitute complementary processes and represent a continuum of cancer progression from the primary tumour to metastases and of tumour growth to EVMM, analogous to the embryonic development program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.