ArticleBurns & trauma2021
Consensus on the health education of home-based negative pressure wound therapy for patients with chronic wounds: a modified Delphi study.
Article in Burns & trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences and Expectations of Hospitalised Patients Undergoing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation: A Qualitative Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Aloe-derived micellar emulsion dressing combination therapy for pressure ulcers: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Review
- Effects of a Situated Simulation Teaching Strategy on Knowledge of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy among Surgical Nurses in Taiwan.Advances in skin & wound care · 2025Article
- Proposal and Verification of New Revised Criteria for ABPA/ABPM Diagnosis.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Article
- Chitosan-Based Dressing as a Sustained Delivery System for Bioactive Cytokines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Variables Associated with Attitudes toward Biodebridement UsingHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nurses' Readiness to Undertake Controlled Negative Pressure Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds-Research Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Construction of haemodialysis nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on Donabedian theory: A Delphi method study.Nursing open · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to develop consensus on the components of health education of home-based negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for patients with chronic wounds.
methodsA Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on the components of health education and 75% agreement and coefficient of variation (CV) <0.25 were used as cutoff. Sixteen experts were recruited purposefully to finish this study.
resultsTwo rounds of consultation were implemented. Consensus was achieved on 36 of the 42 statements. The final agreed list of statements represented three domains: health education before carrying out home-based NPWT, health education for the treatment day of NPWT at hospital and health education for NPWT at home.
conclusionsThis study was the first attempt to develop consensus on the comprehensive components of health education of home-based NPWT for patients with chronic wounds. According to the established framework and components of health education, wound professionals can safely and effectively implement health education of home-based NPWT for patients with chronic wounds and improve their self-care ability and treatment experience at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.