Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34993725›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2022

Small non-coding RNA profiling in breast cancer: plasma U6 snRNA, miR-451a and miR-548b-5p as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Luděk Záveský, Eva Jandáková, Vít Weinberger, Luboš Minář, Veronika Hanzíková, Daniela Dušková, Adéla Faridová, Radovan Turyna, Ondřej Slanař, Aleš Hořínek and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Non-Coding RNAs in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luděk ZáveskýInstitute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic. ludek.zavesky@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-7535
Eva JandákováDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Obilní trh 11, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vít WeinbergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Obilní trh 11, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Luboš MinářDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Obilní trh 11, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Veronika HanzíkováFaculty Transfusion Center, General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniela DuškováFaculty Transfusion Center, General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Prague, Czech Republic.
Adéla FaridováInstitute for Mother and Child Care, Podolské nábřeží 157/36, 147 00, Prague - Podolí, Czech Republic.
Radovan TurynaInstitute for Mother and Child Care, Podolské nábřeží 157/36, 147 00, Prague - Podolí, Czech Republic.
Ondřej SlanařInstitute of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Aleš HořínekInstitute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Milada KohoutováInstitute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZMasaryk University · CZGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZÚstav pro Péči o Matku a Dítě · CZ

Funding

Avast Foundation SSD2018\100022ČEPS, a.s. 1410002088ČEPS, a.s. 1410002385ČEPS, a.s. 1410002640Charles University, Prague Progres Q25/LF1Charles University, Prague Progres Q28/LF1Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic CZ-DRO FNBr 65269705Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic RVO-VFN 64165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Most cases are invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (NST breast carcinomas). METHODS AND

resultsIn this prospective, multicentric biomarker discovery study, we analyzed the expression of small non-coding RNAs (mainly microRNAs) in plasma by qPCR and evaluated their association with NST breast cancer. Large-scale expression profiling and subsequent validations have been performed in patient and control groups and compared with clinicopathological data. Small nuclear U6 snRNA, miR-548b-5p and miR-451a have been identified as candidate biomarkers. U6 snRNA was remarkably overexpressed in all the validations, miR-548b-5p levels were generally elevated and miR-451a expression was mostly downregulated in breast cancer groups. Combined U6 snRNA/miR-548b-5p signature demonstrated the best diagnostic performance based on the ROC curve analysis with AUC of 0.813, sensitivity 73.1% and specificity 82.6%. There was a trend towards increased expression of both miR-548b-5p and U6 snRNA in more advanced stages. Further, increased miR-548b-5p levels have been partially associated with higher grades, multifocality, Ki-67 positivity, and luminal B rather than luminal A samples. On the other hand, an association has been observed between high miR-451a expression and progesterone receptor positivity, lower grade, unifocal samples, Ki-67-negativity, luminal A rather than luminal B samples as well as improved progression-free survival and overall survival.

conclusionsOur results indicated that U6 snRNA and miR-548b-5p may have pro-oncogenic functions, while miR-451a may act as tumor suppressor in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMicroRNAsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesRNA, Small NuclearBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsRNA, Small NuclearU6 small nuclear RNABiomarkerBreast cancermicroRNAmiR-451amiR-548b-5pU6 snRNA

Identifiers

PMID34993725
OpenAlexW4205255097

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.