Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34999745›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Vitamin D and Multiple Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Observational Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials, and Mendelian Randomization Studies.

Di Liu, Xiaoni Meng, Qiuyue Tian, Weijie Cao, Xin Fan, Lijuan Wu, Manshu Song, Qun Meng, Wei Wang, Youxin Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Di LiuBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoni MengBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qiuyue TianBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Weijie CaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin FanSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lijuan WuBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Manshu SongCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Qun MengBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Youxin WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-6706
Capital Medical University · CNEdith Cowan University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have yielded inconsistent results on the associations of vitamin D concentrations with multiple health outcomes. In the present umbrella review we aimed to evaluate the effects of low vitamin D concentrations and vitamin D supplementation on multiple health outcomes. We summarized current evidence obtained from meta-analyses of observational studies that examined associations between vitamin D concentrations and multiple health outcomes, meta-analyses of RCTs that investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on multiple health outcomes, and MR studies that explored the causal associations of vitamin D concentrations with various diseases (international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO registration number CRD42018091434). A total of 296 meta-analyses of observational studies comprising 111 unique outcomes, 139 meta-analyses of RCTs comprising 46 unique outcomes, and 73 MR studies comprising 43 unique outcomes were included in the present umbrella review. Twenty-eight disease outcomes were identified by both meta-analyses of observational studies and MR studies. Seventeen of these reported disease outcomes had consistent results, demonstrating that lower concentrations of vitamin D were associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, schizophrenia, and type 2 diabetes. The combinations of consistent evidence obtained by meta-analyses of observational studies and MR studies together with meta-analyses of RCTs showed that vitamin D supplementation was associated with a decreased risk for all-cause mortality but not associated with the risk for Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, schizophrenia, or type 2 diabetes. The results indicated that vitamin D supplementation is a promising strategy with long-term preventive effects on multiple chronic diseases and thus has the potential to decrease all-cause mortality. However, the current vitamin D supplementation strategy might not be an efficient intervention approach for these diseases, suggesting that new strategies are highly needed to improve the intervention outcomes.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionDietary SupplementsHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsMendelian randomization studiesmeta-analysismultiple health outcomesobservational studiesrandomized controlled trialsumbrella reviewvitamin D deficiencyvitamin D supplementation

Identifiers

PMID34999745
PMCPMC9340982
OpenAlexW4205717212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.