ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021
m6A Modification Patterns With Distinct Immunity, Metabolism, and Stemness Characteristics in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between METTL3 overexpression andBMC cancer · 2025Article
- RNA modifications in cancer immune therapy: regulators of immune cells and immune checkpoints.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Identification of m6a-related signature genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by machine learning method.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Editorial: Systemic immune dysregulation in malignant disease: Insights, monitoring and therapeutic exploitation.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- m6A-related metabolism molecular classification with distinct prognosis and immunotherapy response in soft tissue sarcoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related genes and tumor microenvironment infiltration characterization in breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation has been shown to have prognostic value in cancer. Nonetheless, its potential role regarding immunity, metabolism, and stemness in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains unknown. We comprehensively estimated the m6A modification patterns and corresponding immunity, metabolism, and stemness characteristics based on 568 STS samples and 21 m6A regulators. The m6Ascore was constructed to quantify m6A modification patterns in individuals using machine learning algorithms. Two distinct m6A modification patterns among the STS patients were identified, which exhibited differences in prognosis, immune cell infiltration, metabolic pathways, stemness, somatic mutation, and copy number variation. Thereafter, immunity-, metabolism-, and stemness phenotype-related genes associated with m6A modification were identified. Furthermore, patients with lower m6Ascores had increased antitumor immune responses, survival benefit under immunotherapy, tumor mutation burden, immunogenicity, and response to anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy. Immunotherapy sensitivity was validated using the IMvigor210 dataset. STS patients with lower m6Ascore might be more sensitive to docetaxel and gemcitabine. Finally, pan-cancer analysis illustrated the significant correlations of m6Ascore with clinical outcomes, immune cell infiltration, metabolism, and stemness. This study revealed that m6A modification plays an important role in immunity, metabolism, and stemness in STS. Evaluating the m6A modification pattern and development of m6Ascore may help to guide more effective immunotherapy and chemotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.