Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35004905›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Non-invasive Ischaemia Testing in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Technical Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Andreas Seraphim, Kristopher D Knott, Joao B Augusto, Katia Menacho, Sara Tyebally, Benjamin Dowsing, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya, Leon J Menezes, Daniel A Jones, Rakesh Uppal and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Myocardial perfusion imaging in advanced coronary artery disease.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Safety of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andreas SeraphimDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kristopher D KnottDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Joao B AugustoDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Katia MenachoDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sara TyeballyDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Benjamin DowsingDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sanjeev BhattacharyyaDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Leon J MenezesDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel A JonesDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rakesh UppalDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
James C MoonDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte ManistyDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery effectively relieves symptoms and improves outcomes. However, patients undergoing CABG surgery typically have advanced coronary atherosclerotic disease and remain at high risk for symptom recurrence and adverse events. Functional non-invasive testing for ischaemia is commonly used as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary and graft angiography, and for guiding subsequent revascularisation decisions. However, performing and interpreting non-invasive ischaemia testing in patients post CABG is challenging, irrespective of the imaging modality used. Multiple factors including advanced multi-vessel native vessel disease, variability in coronary hemodynamics post-surgery, differences in graft lengths and vasomotor properties, and complex myocardial scar morphology are only some of the pathophysiological mechanisms that complicate ischaemia evaluation in this patient population. Systematic assessment of the impact of these challenges in relation to each imaging modality may help optimize diagnostic test selection by incorporating clinical information and individual patient characteristics. At the same time, recent technological advances in cardiac imaging including improvements in image quality, wider availability of quantitative techniques for measuring myocardial blood flow and the introduction of artificial intelligence-based approaches for image analysis offer the opportunity to re-evaluate the value of ischaemia testing, providing new insights into the pathophysiological processes that determine outcomes in this patient population.

Indexed as

CABGischaemia detectionmyocardial perfusionstress imagingsurgical revascularisation

Identifiers

PMID35004905
PMCPMC8733203

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.