Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35005692›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and social inequalities in different subgroups of healthcare workers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Roberta Fernandes Correia, Ana Carolina Carioca da Costa, Daniella Campelo Batalha Cox Moore, Saint Clair Gomes Junior, Maria Paula Carneiro de Oliveira, Maria Célia Chaves Zuma, Rômulo Gonçalves Galvani, Wilson Savino, Adriana Cesar Bonomo, Zilton Farias Meira Vasconcelos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Cumulative seroprevalence among healthcare workers after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in El Salvador, Central America.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberta Fernandes CorreiaNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Carioca da CostaNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Daniella Campelo Batalha Cox MooreNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Saint Clair Gomes JuniorNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Maria Paula Carneiro de OliveiraNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Maria Célia Chaves ZumaNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Rômulo Gonçalves GalvaniLaboratory on Thymus Research, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21045-900, Brazil.
Wilson SavinoLaboratory on Thymus Research, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21045-900, Brazil.
Adriana Cesar BonomoLaboratory on Thymus Research, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21045-900, Brazil.
Zilton Farias Meira VasconcelosNational Institute of Health for Women, Children and Adolescents Fernandes Figueira/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, Brazil.
Elizabeth ArtmannNational School of Public Health/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has exacerbated health inequalities worldwide. Yet, such a perspective has not been investigated in specific healthcare workers and their resulting inclusion as a priority group for vaccination have been an important focus of political and social discussion. This study aimed at investigating whether SARS-CoV-2-seropositivity in healthcare workers in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was influenced by social determinants of health and the social vulnerability in subgroups of workers.

methodsA serological survey was conducted in 1,154 healthcare workers in June and July 2020. The association between the serological test results for detection of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and socioeconomic, occupational characteristics and transportation used by the workers to commute was assessed using the Pearson´s chi-square test and Cramer's V.

findingsOverall, the serum prevalence for the virus in the healthcare workers was 30% (342/1141). Non-white workers (208/561) with lower income (169/396) and schooling (150/353), as well as users of the mass transportation system (157/246) showed the highest infection rates. Importantly they mostly corresponded to hospital support workers (131/324), in particular the cleaning personnel (42/70). Accordingly, income, schooling and work modality appeared as negative predictors, as ascertained by forest plot analysis. INTERPRETATIONS: The data clearly illustrate the inequality in SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Brazilian population, comprising even healthcare workers of the Brazilian unified health system.

Indexed as

COVID-19healthcare professionalshealthcare workersIgG, Immunoglobulin GinequalitySARS-CoV-2 seroprevalenceSARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2social determinants of healthsupport workers

Identifiers

PMID35005692
PMCPMC8718903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.