ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Interpretable machine learning for high-dimensional trajectories of aging health.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identifying predictors and assessing causal effect on hypertension risk among adults using Double Machine Learning models: Insights from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Biomarker integration and biosensor technologies enabling AI-driven insights into biological aging.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
- Dynamical Network Stability Analysis of Multiple Biological Ages Provides a Framework for Understanding the Aging Process.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Longitudinal Fragility Phenotyping Predicts Lifespan and Age-Associated Morbidity in C57BL/6 and Diversity Outbred Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Longitudinal machine learning uncouples healthy aging factors from chronic disease risks.Nature aging · 2024Article
- Network dynamical stability analysis reveals key "mallostatic" natural variables that erode homeostasis and drive age-related decline of health.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Measuring healthy ageing: current and future tools.Biogerontology · 2023Review
- Explainable machine learning framework to predict personalized physiological aging.Aging cell · 2023Article
- Efficient representations of binarized health deficit data: the frailty index and beyond.GeroScience · 2023Article
- A complex systems approach to aging biology.Nature aging · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have built a computational model for individual aging trajectories of health and survival, which contains physical, functional, and biological variables, and is conditioned on demographic, lifestyle, and medical background information. We combine techniques of modern machine learning with an interpretable interaction network, where health variables are coupled by explicit pair-wise interactions within a stochastic dynamical system. Our dynamic joint interpretable network (DJIN) model is scalable to large longitudinal data sets, is predictive of individual high-dimensional health trajectories and survival from baseline health states, and infers an interpretable network of directed interactions between the health variables. The network identifies plausible physiological connections between health variables as well as clusters of strongly connected health variables. We use English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) data to train our model and show that it performs better than multiple dedicated linear models for health outcomes and survival. We compare our model with flexible lower-dimensional latent-space models to explore the dimensionality required to accurately model aging health outcomes. Our DJIN model can be used to generate synthetic individuals that age realistically, to impute missing data, and to simulate future aging outcomes given arbitrary initial health states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.