Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35008296›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

New Perspectives for Eye-Sparing Treatment Strategies in Primary Uveal Melanoma.

Krzysztof Bilmin, Kamil J Synoradzki, Anna M Czarnecka, Mateusz J Spałek, Tamara Kujawska, Małgorzata Solnik, Piotr Merks, Mario Damiano Toro, Robert Rejdak, Michał Fiedorowicz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Personalized treatment approaches in intraocular cancer.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Krzysztof BilminDepartment of Health Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland.
Kamil J SynoradzkiSmall Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1019-1982
Anna M CzarneckaDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-3810
Mateusz J SpałekDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3960-7673
Tamara KujawskaInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-3925
Małgorzata SolnikFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr MerksDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, 01-815 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3799
Mario Damiano ToroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-2613
Robert RejdakChair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-079 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-2723
Michał FiedorowiczSmall Animal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5755-3608
Medical University of Lublin · PLMossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw · PLInstitute of Fundamental Technological Research · PLJan Długosz University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

National Centre for Research and Development LIDER/39/0215/L-10/18/NCBR/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy and arises from melanocytes in the choroid, ciliary body, or iris. The current eye-sparing treatment options include surgical treatment, plaque brachytherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, stereotactic photon radiotherapy, or photodynamic therapy. However, the efficacy of these methods is still unsatisfactory. This article reviews several possible new treatment options and their potential advantages in treating localized uveal melanoma. These methods may be based on the physical destruction of the cancerous cells by applying ultrasounds. Two examples of such an approach are High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)-a promising technology of thermal destruction of solid tumors located deep under the skin and sonodynamic therapy (SDT) that induces reactive oxygen species. Another approach may be based on improving the penetration of anti-cancer agents into UM cells. The most promising technologies from this group are based on enhancing drug delivery by applying electric current. One such approach is called transcorneal iontophoresis and has already been shown to increase the local concentration of several different therapeutics. Another technique, electrically enhanced chemotherapy, may promote drug delivery from the intercellular space to cells. Finally, new advanced nanoparticles are developed to combine diagnostic imaging and therapy (i.e., theranostics). However, these methods are mostly at an early stage of development. More advanced and targeted preclinical studies and clinical trials would be needed to introduce some of these techniques to routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

electrotherapyHIFUiontophoresisnanoparticlestheranosticsuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID35008296
PMCPMC8750035
OpenAlexW4226059593

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.