Evidence mapPaperPMID 35011603Full record

Trial reportCells2021

The Effects of a Preconception Lifestyle Intervention on Childhood Cardiometabolic Health-Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stijn Mintjens, Mireille N M van Poppel, Henk Groen, Annemieke Hoek, Ben Willem Mol, Rebecca C Painter, Reinoud J B J Gemke, Tessa J Roseboom

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stijn MintjensDepartment of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8018-3921
Mireille N M van PoppelAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk GroenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annemieke HoekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ben Willem MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Monash Medical Center, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinoud J B J GemkeDepartment of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0564-5994
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLMonash Medical Centre · AUNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · USUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

DynaHealth H2020 grant 633595Hartstichting 2013T085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal obesity is associated with adverse metabolic outcomes in her offspring, from the earliest stages of development leading to obesity and poorer cardiometabolic health in her offspring. We investigated whether an effective preconception lifestyle intervention in obese women affected cardiometabolic health of their offspring. We randomly allocated 577 infertile women with obesity to a 6-month lifestyle intervention, or to prompt infertility management. Of the 305 eligible children, despite intensive efforts, 17 in the intervention and 29 in the control group were available for follow-up at age 3-6 years. We compared the child's Body Mass Index (BMI) Z score, waist and hip circumference, body-fat percentage, blood pressure Z scores, pulse wave velocity and serum lipids, glucose and insulin concentrations. Between the intervention and control groups, the mean (±SD) offspring BMI Z score (0.69 (±1.17) vs. 0.62 (±1.04)) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure Z scores (0.45 (±0.65) vs. 0.54 (±0.57); 0.91 (±0.66) vs. 0.96 (±0.57)) were similar, although elevated compared to the norm population. We also did not detect any differences between the groups in the other outcomes. In this study, we could not detect effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women on the cardiometabolic health of their offspring. Low follow-up rates, perhaps due to the children's age or the subject matter, combined with selection bias abating contrast in periconceptional weight between participating mothers, hampered the detection of potential effects. Future studies that account for these factors are needed to confirm whether a preconception lifestyle intervention may improve the cardiometabolic health of children of obese mothers.

Indexed as

Cardiometabolic Risk FactorsChild HealthLife StyleAdultAnimalsCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleFertilizationFollow-Up StudiesHumansPregnancycardiometabolic healthchildhood obesityfollow-uplifestyle interventionmaternal obesityprogramming

Identifiers

PMID35011603
PMCPMC8750944
OpenAlexW4200172993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.