Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011644›Full record

SynthesisCells2021

In Vitro Monitoring of Human T Cell Responses to Skin Sensitizing Chemicals-A Systematic Review.

Marina Aparicio-Soto, Caterina Curato, Franziska Riedel, Hermann-Josef Thierse, Andreas Luch, Katherina Siewert

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina Aparicio-SotoDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5483-1366
Caterina CuratoDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4938-7288
Franziska RiedelDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2395-5454
Hermann-Josef ThierseDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9655-681X
Andreas LuchDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Katherina SiewertDepartment of Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0380-1594
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment 1322-718, 1322-719, 1322-754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemical allergies are T cell-mediated diseases that often manifest in the skin as allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). To prevent ACD on a public health scale and avoid elicitation reactions at the individual patient level, predictive and diagnostic tests, respectively, are indispensable. Currently, there is no validated in vitro T cell assay available. The main bottlenecks concern the inefficient generation of T cell epitopes and the detection of rare antigen-specific T cells.

methodsHere, we systematically review original experimental research papers describing T cell activation to chemical skin sensitizers. We focus our search on studies published in the PubMed and Scopus databases on non-metallic allergens in the last 20 years.

resultsWe identified 37 papers, among them 32 (86%) describing antigen-specific human T cell activation to 31 different chemical allergens. The remaining studies measured the general effects of chemical allergens on T cell function (five studies, 14%). Most antigen-specific studies used peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as antigen-presenting cells (APC, 75%) and interrogated the blood T cell pool (91%). Depending on the individual chemical properties, T cell epitopes were generated either by direct administration into the culture medium (72%), separate modification of autologous APC (29%) or by use of hapten-modified model proteins (13%). Read-outs were mainly based on proliferation (91%), often combined with cytokine secretion (53%). The analysis of T cell clones offers additional opportunities to elucidate the mechanisms of epitope formation and cross-reactivity (13%). The best researched allergen was

interpretationOur results illustrate current hardships and possible solutions to monitoring T cell responses to individual chemical skin sensitizers. The provided data can guide the further development of T cell assays to unfold their full predictive and diagnostic potential, including cross-reactivity assessments.

Indexed as

AllergensAntigensEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansLymphocyte ActivationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSkinT-LymphocytesAllergensAntigensEpitopes, T-LymphocyteReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellallergic contact dermatitisantigen specificitychemical sensitizersin vitro testlymphocyte transformation testT cell assays

Identifiers

PMID35011644
PMCPMC8750770
OpenAlexW4200273402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.