Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011984›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Clinical Presentation of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Infection and Predictive Validity of the PCR Test in Primary Health Care Worker Patients of the Spanish National Health System.

Esperanza Romero-Rodríguez, Luis A Pérula-de Torres, Jesús González-Lama, Celia Jiménez-García, Rafael A Castro-Jiménez, Jerónimo J González-Bernal, Paula Rodríguez-Fernández, Juan Mielgo-Ayuso, Mirian Santamaría-Peláez, Josefa González-Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Esperanza Romero-RodríguezMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, University of Córdoba, 14011 Cordoba, Spain.
Luis A Pérula-de TorresMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, University of Córdoba, 14011 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-4905
Jesús González-LamaMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, University of Córdoba, 14011 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-9677
Celia Jiménez-GarcíaMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, University of Córdoba, 14011 Cordoba, Spain.
Rafael A Castro-JiménezMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba, Reina Sofía University Hospital, University of Córdoba, 14011 Cordoba, Spain.
Jerónimo J González-BernalDepartment of Health Sciences of Burgos, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-9060
Paula Rodríguez-FernándezDepartment of Health Sciences of Burgos, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Juan Mielgo-AyusoDepartment of Health Sciences of Burgos, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-4602
Mirian Santamaría-PeláezDepartment of Health Sciences of Burgos, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4255-7355
Josefa González-SantosDepartment of Health Sciences of Burgos, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the impact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection has presented in Spain, data on the diagnostic capacity of the symptoms associated with this infection are limited, especially among patients with mild symptoms and who are detected in the primary care field (PC). The objective of the present study was to know the associated symptoms and their predictive criterial validity in SARS-CoV-2 infection among professionals working in PC.

methodsA cross-sectional, multicenter study was carried out in the Spanish National Health System, through an epidemiological survey directed to patients who underwent the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in the PC setting.

resultsA total of 1612 patients participated, of which 86.6% were PC healthcare professionals, and of these, 67.4% family doctors. Hyposmia, with a sensitivity of 42.69% (95% CI: 37.30-48.08) and a specificity of 95.91% (95% CI: 94.78-97.03), and ageusia with a sensitivity of 39.47% (34.15-44.80) and a specificity of 95.20% (93.98-96.41) were the symptoms with the highest criteria validity indexes.

conclusionsThis study identifies the specific symptoms of loss of smell or taste as the most frequently associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, essential in the detection of COVID-19 given its high frequency and predictive capacity.

Indexed as

COVID-19health professionalpredictive valueprimary careSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35011984
PMCPMC8745753

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.