Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013280›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Dynamics of GLP-1R peptide agonist engagement are correlated with kinetics of G protein activation.

Giuseppe Deganutti, Yi-Lynn Liang, Xin Zhang, Maryam Khoshouei, Lachlan Clydesdale, Matthew J Belousoff, Hari Venugopal, Tin T Truong, Alisa Glukhova, Andrew N Keller and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Distinctive molecular architectures of GActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Giuseppe Deganutti *Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, CV1 5FB, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8780-2986
Yi-Lynn Liang *Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Xin Zhang *Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Maryam Khoshouei *Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Lachlan Clydesdale *Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Matthew J BelousoffDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Hari VenugopalRamaciotti Centre for Cryo-Electron Microscopy, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Tin T TruongDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Alisa GlukhovaDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-965X
Andrew N KellerDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Karen J GregoryDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3833-2137
Katie LeachDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-1803
Arthur ChristopoulosDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4442-3294
Radostin DanevGraduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, N415, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6406-8993
Christopher A ReynoldsCentre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, CV1 5FB, Coventry, UK. ad5291@coventry.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-5141
Peishen ZhaoDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. elva.zhao@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0185-0595
Patrick M SextonDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. patrick.sexton@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-2473
Denise WoottenDrug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. denise.wootten@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-1642
Monash University · AUDiscovery Institute · USUniversity of Essex · GBAblynx (Belgium) · BENovartis (Switzerland) · CHThe University of Tokyo · JPWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) has broad physiological roles and is a validated target for treatment of metabolic disorders. Despite recent advances in GLP-1R structure elucidation, detailed mechanistic understanding of how different peptides generate profound differences in G protein-mediated signalling is still lacking. Here we combine cryo-electron microscopy, molecular dynamics simulations, receptor mutagenesis and pharmacological assays, to interrogate the mechanism and consequences of GLP-1R binding to four peptide agonists; glucagon-like peptide-1, oxyntomodulin, exendin-4 and exendin-P5. These data reveal that distinctions in peptide N-terminal interactions and dynamics with the GLP-1R transmembrane domain are reciprocally associated with differences in the allosteric coupling to G proteins. In particular, transient interactions with residues at the base of the binding cavity correlate with enhanced kinetics for G protein activation, providing a rationale for differences in G protein-mediated signalling efficacy from distinct agonists.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationBaculoviridaeBinding SitesCloning, MolecularCryoelectron MicroscopyExenatideGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorHEK293 CellsHumansKineticsLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationExenatideGLP1R protein, humanGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorLigandsOxyntomodulinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35013280
PMCPMC8748714
OpenAlexW4221119792

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.