Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35015279›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2021

Hot and Cold Theory: Evidence in Pharmacology.

Roodabeh Bahramsoltani, Roja Rahimi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roodabeh BahramsoltaniDepartment of Traditional Pharmacy, School of Persian Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Roja RahimiDepartment of Traditional Pharmacy, School of Persian Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rojarahimi@gmail.com.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional and folk medicine from different countries are valuable sources of new ideas to design novel natural products for health and diseases. In this field, the classification of medicinal plants and other natural medicinal materials into hot or cold categories is a common concept within different doctrines of complementary and alternative medicine such as Persian medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, and Indian medicine. Today, a growing body of evidence is being provided to support different pathophysiologic bases of this categorization, as well as the pharmacological targets affected by natural products from each of the two categories. Different body systems such as endocrine and nervous systems are influenced by the hot/cold materials, some of which have been studied in animals or humans. This chapter focuses on the pharmacological evidence supporting the hot/cold nature of medicinal plants.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalAnimalsHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPhytotherapyEthnopharmacologyIndian medicineLatin American medicinePersian medicineTraditional Chinese medicineTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID35015279
OpenAlexW4205927493

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.