Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35016892›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology2022

From Data to Deployment: The Collaborative Community on Ophthalmic Imaging Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Eliot R Dow, Tiarnan D L Keenan, Eleonora M Lad, Aaron Y Lee, Cecilia S Lee, Anat Loewenstein, Malvina B Eydelman, Emily Y Chew, Pearse A Keane, Jennifer I Lim and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Artificial intelligence for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis in Australia: A Novel Qualitative Interview Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The march to harmonized imaging standards for retinal imaging.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Eliot R DowByers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Tiarnan D L KeenanDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Eleonora M LadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Aaron Y LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Cecilia S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Anat LoewensteinDivision of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Malvina B EydelmanOffice of Health Technology 1, Center of Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Emily Y ChewDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: echew@nei.nih.gov.
Pearse A KeaneNIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Pearse.Keane@moorfields.nhs.uk.
Jennifer I LimDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: jennylim@uic.edu.
Collaborative Community for Ophthalmic Imaging Executive Committee and the Working Group for Artificial Intelligence in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
University of Washington · USCenter for Devices and Radiological Health · USDuke Medical Center · USNational Eye Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Aging eyes and aging brains in studying alzheimer's disease: Modern ophthalmic data collection in the adult changes in thought (ACT) studyR01AG060942 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Cecilia Sungmin Lee · 2019 to 2026
$39.4M
Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of diabetic macular edemaK23EY029246 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, AARON · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
Age-Related Eye Disease Follow-up Study (AREDS) Follow-up StudyZIAEY000489 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI CHEW, EMILY Y · 2009 to 2025
$639k
CSRD VA I01 CX002116Medical Research Council MR/T019050/1NEI NIH HHS K23 EY029246NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealth care systems worldwide are challenged to provide adequate care for the 200 million individuals with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to make a significant, positive impact on the diagnosis and management of patients with AMD; however, the development of effective AI devices for clinical care faces numerous considerations and challenges, a fact evidenced by a current absence of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AI devices for AMD. PURPOSE: To delineate the state of AI for AMD, including current data, standards, achievements, and challenges.

methodsMembers of the Collaborative Community on Ophthalmic Imaging Working Group for AI in AMD attended an inaugural meeting on September 7, 2020, to discuss the topic. Subsequently, they undertook a comprehensive review of the medical literature relevant to the topic. Members engaged in meetings and discussion through December 2021 to synthesize the information and arrive at a consensus.

resultsExisting infrastructure for robust AI development for AMD includes several large, labeled data sets of color fundus photography and OCT images; however, image data often do not contain the metadata necessary for the development of reliable, valid, and generalizable models. Data sharing for AMD model development is made difficult by restrictions on data privacy and security, although potential solutions are under investigation. Computing resources may be adequate for current applications, but knowledge of machine learning development may be scarce in many clinical ophthalmology settings. Despite these challenges, researchers have produced promising AI models for AMD for screening, diagnosis, prediction, and monitoring. Future goals include defining benchmarks to facilitate regulatory authorization and subsequent clinical setting generalization.

conclusionsDelivering an FDA-authorized, AI-based device for clinical care in AMD involves numerous considerations, including the identification of an appropriate clinical application; acquisition and development of a large, high-quality data set; development of the AI architecture; training and validation of the model; and functional interactions between the model output and clinical end user. The research efforts undertaken to date represent starting points for the medical devices that eventually will benefit providers, health care systems, and patients.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesMacular DegenerationOphthalmologyArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalHumansUnited StatesAge-related macular degenerationArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningOCT

Identifiers

PMID35016892
PMCPMC9859710
OpenAlexW4205723032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.