Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35017415›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2022

Construction and imaging of a neurovascular unit model.

Taiwei Dong, Min Li, Feng Gao, Peifeng Wei, Jian Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown in Neuroinflammation: Current In Vitro Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Bioprinting for bone tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taiwei DongCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, China.
Min LiCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, China.
Feng GaoCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, China.
Peifeng WeiCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, China.
Jian WangCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Provinve, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2001, the concept of the neurovascular unit was introduced at the Stroke Progress Review Group meeting. The neurovascular unit is an important element of the health and disease status of blood vessels and nerves in the central nervous system. Since then, the neurovascular unit has attracted increasing interest from research teams, who have contributed greatly to the prevention, treatment, and prognosis of stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. However, additional research is needed to establish an efficient, low-cost, and low-energy in vitro model of the neurovascular unit, as well as enable noninvasive observation of neurovascular units in vivo and in vitro. In this review, we first summarize the composition of neurovascular units, then investigate the efficacy of different types of stem cells and cell culture methods in the construction of neurovascular unit models, and finally assess the progress of imaging methods used to observe neurovascular units in recent years and their positive role in the monitoring and investigation of the mechanisms of a variety of central nervous system diseases.

Indexed as

3D printingblood-brain barriercomputational biologyencephalopathyimaging techniquesmicrofluidic on-chip methodsnerve cell co-cultureneurovascular unitreviewstem cells

Identifiers

PMID35017415
PMCPMC8820720

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.