Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35019118›Full record

Trial reportArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2022

ARE THERE BENEFITS IN PERFORMING GASTRO-OMENTOPEXY IN LAPAROSCOPIC VERTICAL GASTRECTOMY?

Maíra Danielle Gomes de Souza, Lyz Bezerra Silva, Álvaro A B Ferraz, Josemberg Marins Campos

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maíra Danielle Gomes de SouzaPostgraduate Program in Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-0226
Lyz Bezerra SilvaPostgraduate Program in Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-9337
Álvaro A B FerrazPostgraduate Program in Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3832-3927
Josemberg Marins CamposPostgraduate Program in Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-0102
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastro-omentopexy promotes the reconnection of the stomach to the gastroesplenic and gastrocolic ligaments and constitutes an alternative for the prevention of complications in laparoscopic vertical gastrectomy.

aimTo demonstrate the benefits of the gastro-omentopexy technique in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, with possible reduction in postoperative complications.

methodsProspective, non-randomized, case series type study, consisting of a clinical population of 179 patients who underwent the technique in 2018, with follow-up between 6-12 months in the postoperative period.

resultsFrom the participants 71.5% were women, aged between 30-40 years (36.3%). As for the prevalence of complications in the postoperative period, the low prevalence was evident, with emphasis on readmission (1.1%); reoperation (1.1%); wound infection (1.1%); bleeding hemorrhage (0.5%); and stricture (1.1%). However, temporary symptoms were present such as nausea/vomiting, food intolerance, epigastric pain and feeling of fullness, right after surgery.

conclusionThe technique promoted a significant improvement in quality of life and control of comorbidities. In addition, it was associated with a low prevalence of stenosis, and with no fistula, making the method safer.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultFemaleGastrectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesStomachTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35019118
PMCPMC8735264
OpenAlexW4206187351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.