ArticleJAMA cardiology2022
Combined Cardiac Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Myocardial Injury in Patients Who Recently Recovered From COVID-19.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myocardial Tissue Characterization in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Studies of Patients Recovering From COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of COVID-19-Associated Cardiac Sequelae: A Systematic Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- 2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Cardiovascular Sequelae of COVID-19 in Adults: Myocarditis and Other Myocardial Involvement, Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, and Return to Play: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Guideline
- Prevalence of Persistent Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Abnormalities on PET/MRI and DECT Imaging in Long COVID Patients.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Association between Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Myocardial Fibrosis Assessed with Cardiac MRI.Radiology · 2025Article
- Can FDG PET Serve as a Clinically Relevant Tool for Detecting Active Non-sarcoidotic Myocarditis?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- MRI of cardiac involvement in COVID-19.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Review
- Myocardial Blood Flow Quantified Using Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance After Mild COVID-19 Infection.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Review
- Development of a novel machine learning model based on laboratory and imaging indices to predict acute cardiac injury in cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: a retrospective observational study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- Absence of long-term structural and functional cardiac abnormalities on multimodality imaging in a multi-ethnic group of COVID-19 survivors from the early stage of the pandemic.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2023Article
- COVID-19: Insights into long-term manifestations and lockdown impacts.Journal of sport and health science · 2023Review
- Beyond Acute COVID-19: A Review of Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Review
- Review
- Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID.Circulation research · 2023Review
- Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis and Myocardial Injury.Circulation research · 2023Review
- Myocarditis Following COVID-19 Vaccination.Heart failure clinics · 2023Review
- Myocardial Inflammation on FDG PET/MRI and Clinical Outcomes in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Participants after COVID-19 Vaccination.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for evaluation of cardiac involvement in COVID-19: recommendations by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBeyond the2022
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceAlthough myocardial injury can occur with acute COVID-19, there is limited understanding of changes with myocardial metabolism in recovered patients.
objectiveTo examine myocardial metabolic changes early after recovery from COVID-19 using fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) and associate these changes to abnormalities in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based function and tissue characterization measures and inflammatory blood markers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis prospective cohort study took place at a single-center tertiary referral hospital system. A volunteer sample of adult patients within 3 months of a diagnosis of COVID-19 who responded to a mail invitation were recruited for cardiac PET/MRI and blood biomarker evaluation between November 2020 and June 2021. EXPOSURES: Myocardial inflammation as determined by focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, cardiac and inflammatory blood markers, and fasting combined cardiac 18F-FDG PET/MRI imaging were obtained. All patients with focal FDG uptake at baseline returned for repeated PET/MRI and blood marker assessment 2 months later.
resultsOf 47 included patients, 24 (51%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 43 (13) years. The mean (SD) interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and PET/MRI was 67 (16) days. Most patients recovered at home during the acute infection (40 [85%]). Eight patients (17%) had focal FDG uptake on PET consistent with myocardial inflammation. Compared with those without FDG uptake, patients with focal FDG uptake had higher regional T2, T1, and extracellular volume (colocalizing with focal FDG uptake), higher prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement (6 of 8 [75%] vs 9 of 39 [23%], P = .009), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean [SD], 55% [4%] vs 62% [5%], P < .001), worse global longitudinal and circumferential strain (mean [SD], -16% [2%] vs -17% [2%], P = .02 and -18% [2%] vs -20% [2%], P = .047, respectively), and higher systemic inflammatory blood markers including interleukin 6, interleukin 8, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Among patients with focal FDG uptake, PET/MRI, and inflammatory blood markers resolved or improved at follow-up performed a mean (SD) of 52 (17) days after baseline PET/MRI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study of patients recently recovered from COVID-19, myocardial inflammation was identified on PET in a small proportion of patients, was associated with cardiac MRI abnormalities and elevated inflammatory blood markers at baseline, and improved at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.