Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35020123›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

Freezing firefly algorithm for efficient planted (ℓ, d) motif search.

P Theepalakshmi, U Srinivasulu Reddy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P TheepalakshmiDepartment of Computer Applications, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India. theepalakshmirajan@gmail.com.
U Srinivasulu ReddyMachine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence, Department of Computer Applications, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of inimitable patterns (motif) occurring in a set of biological sequences could elevate new biological discoveries. Its application in recognition of transcription factors and their binding sites have demonstrated the necessity to attain knowledge of gene function, human diseases, and drug design. The literature identifies (ℓ, d) motif search as the widely studied problem in PMS (Planted Motif Search). This paper proposes an efficient optimization algorithm named "Freezing FireFly (FFF)" to solve (ℓ, d) motif search problem. The new strategy freezing such as local and global was added to increase the performance of the basic Firefly algorithm. It freezes the best possible out coming positions even in the lesser brighter one. The performance of the proposed algorithm is experienced on simulated and real datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm resolves the instance (50, 21) within 1.47 min in the simulated dataset. For real (such as ChIP-seq (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation)) and synthetic datasets, the proposed algorithm runs much faster in comparison to existing state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, including Samselect, TraverStringRef, PMS8, qPMS9, AlignACE, FMGA, and GSGA.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyFreezingHumansFirefly algorithmFreezing fireflyGlobal freezeLocal freezePlanted (ℓ,d) motif search

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.