ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Freezing firefly algorithm for efficient planted (ℓ, d) motif search.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of inimitable patterns (motif) occurring in a set of biological sequences could elevate new biological discoveries. Its application in recognition of transcription factors and their binding sites have demonstrated the necessity to attain knowledge of gene function, human diseases, and drug design. The literature identifies (ℓ, d) motif search as the widely studied problem in PMS (Planted Motif Search). This paper proposes an efficient optimization algorithm named "Freezing FireFly (FFF)" to solve (ℓ, d) motif search problem. The new strategy freezing such as local and global was added to increase the performance of the basic Firefly algorithm. It freezes the best possible out coming positions even in the lesser brighter one. The performance of the proposed algorithm is experienced on simulated and real datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm resolves the instance (50, 21) within 1.47 min in the simulated dataset. For real (such as ChIP-seq (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation)) and synthetic datasets, the proposed algorithm runs much faster in comparison to existing state-of-the-art optimization algorithms, including Samselect, TraverStringRef, PMS8, qPMS9, AlignACE, FMGA, and GSGA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35020123What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.