Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35028490›Full record

ArticleAPL bioengineering2022

Viscous shaping of the compliant cell nucleus.

Richard B Dickinson, Aditya Katiyar, Christina R Dubell, Tanmay P Lele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APL bioengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evidence for Drop-Like Nuclear Deformation in Sheared Endothelial Monolayers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Indentation induces instantaneous nuclear stiffening and unfolding of nuclear envelope wrinkles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Editorial: Nuclear morphology in development and disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Mechanobiology of the cell nucleus.APL bioengineering · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Elephant in the Cell: Nuclear Mechanics and Mechanobiology.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard B DickinsonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-2889
Aditya KatiyarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-6320
Christina R DubellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2628-5342

Funding

Nuclear Dysfunction in Cancer: The Role of Mechanical Stresses Transmittedby the LINC ComplexU01CA225566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LELE, TANMAY P. · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell nucleus is commonly considered to be a stiff organelle that mechanically resists changes in shape, and this resistance is thought to limit the ability of cells to migrate through pores or spread on surfaces. Generation of stresses on the cell nucleus during migration and nuclear response to these stresses is fundamental to cell migration and mechano-transduction. In this Perspective, we discuss our previous experimental and computational evidence that supports a dynamic model, in which the soft nucleus is irreversibly shaped by viscous stresses generated by the motion of cell boundaries and transmitted through the intervening cytoskeletal network. While the nucleus is commonly modeled as a stiff elastic body, we review how nuclear shape changes on the timescale of migration can be explained by simple geometric constraints of constant nuclear volume and constant surface area of the nuclear lamina. Because the lamina surface area is in excess of that of a sphere of the same volume, these constraints permit dynamic transitions between a wide range of shapes during spreading and migration. The excess surface area allows the nuclear shape changes to mirror those of the cell with little mechanical resistance. Thus, the nucleus can be easily shaped by the moving cell boundaries over a wide range of shape changes and only becomes stiff to more extreme deformations that would require the lamina to stretch or the volume to compress. This model explains how nuclei can easily flatten on surfaces during cell spreading or elongate as cells move through pores until the lamina smooths out and becomes tense.

Identifiers

PMID35028490
PMCPMC8730821

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.