ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Personalized nursing improves physical condition and life quality of patients undergoing interventional therapy for liver cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effect of rapid rehabilitation nursing on inflammation and liver function after laparoscopic radical resection of primary liver cancer.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventional therapy, which can prolong the survival of patients with liver cancer (LC), is an important means to treat the disease. During interventional therapy for LC, it is essential to make a targeted and detailed nursing plan to ameliorate the prognosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the application significance of personalized nursing in patients undergoing interventional therapy for LC. We retrospectively analyzed 136 patients with LC undergoing interventional therapy. Among them, 70 cases receiving personalized nursing were assigned to the observation group (OG), and the remaining 66 cases receiving routine nursing were the control group (CG). After nursing, sleep time of patients in the OG was significantly longer than that in CG. In addition, time to ambulation and hospital stay were shorter in the OG than in the CG. Furthermore, the OG exhibited significantly lower scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), as well as significantly reduced incidence of adverse reactions than the CG. Compared with the CG, the levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (AST), aspartate aminotransferase (ALT), and total bilirubin (TBIL) were significantly lower in the OG after nursing, while the level of albumin (ALB) was significantly increased. Moreover, patients in the OG showed significantly higher nursing satisfaction and quality of life scores than those in the CG. Therefore, personalized nursing has good prospects for usein interventional therapy for LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35035768PMC8748081W4206893542What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.