Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35035934›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2022

Assessment of hypertension in kidney transplantation by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anna Pisano, Francesca Mallamaci, Graziella D'Arrigo, Davide Bolignano, Gregoire Wuerzner, Alberto Ortiz, Michel Burnier, Nada Kanaan, Pantelis Sarafidis, Alexandre Persu and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A European Renal Association (ERA) synopsis for nephrology practice of the 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. New kidneys, old risks: cardiovascular challenges after transplantation.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Circadian rhythms in solid organ transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Anna PisanoCNR-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Francesca MallamaciCNR-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Graziella D'ArrigoCNR-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Davide BolignanoCNR-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-245X
Gregoire WuerznerService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-7630
Alberto OrtizNephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-9523
Michel BurnierService of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-8487
Nada KanaanDivision of Nephrology, Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Pole of Cardiovascular Research, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pantelis SarafidisDepartment of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9174-4018
Alexandre PersuDivision of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Charles J FerroDepartment of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-7081
Charalampos LoutradisDepartment of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6387-4176
Ioannis N BoletisDepartment of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Athens Medical School, Laiko Hospital.
Gérard LondonFCRIN INI-CRCT Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists, Manhes Hospital and FCRIN INI-CRCT, Manhes, France.
Jean-Michel HalimiService de Néphrologie-Hypertension, Dialyses, Transplantation rénale, CHRU Tours,Tours, France and INSERM SPHERE U1246, Université Tours, Université de Nantes, Tours, France.
Bénédicte SautenetService de Néphrologie-Hypertension, Dialyses, Transplantation rénale, CHRU Tours, Tours, France and INSERM SPHERE U1246, Université Tours, Université de Nantes, Tours, France, and FCRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
Patrick RossignolUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm 1433 CIC-P CHRU de Nancy, Inserm U1116 and FCRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France.
Liffert VogtDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Nephrology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carmine ZoccaliCNR-Institute of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Physiopathology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-1996
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Lausanne · CHAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFrench Clinical Research Infrastructure Network · FRHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESInserm · FRLaiko General Hospital of Athens · GRMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension (HTN) is common following renal transplantation and it is associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular (CV) and graft health. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is the preferred method to characterize blood pressure (BP) status, since HTN misclassification by office BP (OBP) is quite common in this population. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at determining the clinical utility of 24-h ABPM and its potential implications for the management of HTN in this population.

methodsOvid-MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for interventional or observational studies enrolling adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) undergoing 24-h ABP readings compared with OBP or home BP. The main outcome was the proportion of KTRs diagnosed with HTN by ABPM, home or OBP recordings. Additionally, day-night BP variability and dipper/non-dipper status were assessed.

resultsForty-two eligible studies (4115 participants) were reviewed. A cumulative analysis including 27 studies (3481 participants) revealed a prevalence of uncontrolled HTN detected by ABPM of 56% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46-65%]. The pooled prevalence of uncontrolled HTN according to OBP was 47% (95% CI 36-58%) in 25 studies (3261 participants). Very few studies reported on home BP recordings. The average concordance rate between OBP and ABPM measurements in classifying patients as controlled or uncontrolled hypertensive was 66% (95% CI 59-73%). ABPM revealed HTN phenotypes among KTRs. Two pooled analyses of 11 and 10 studies, respectively, revealed an average prevalence of 26% (95% CI 19-33%) for masked HTN (MHT) and 10% (95% CI 6-17%) for white-coat HTN (WCH). The proportion of non-dippers was variable across the 28 studies that analysed dipping status, with an average prevalence of 54% (95% CI 45-63%).

conclusionsIn our systematic review, comparison of OBP versus ABP measurements disclosed a high proportion of MHT, uncontrolled HTN and, to a lesser extent, WCH in KTRs. These results suggest that HTN is not adequately diagnosed and controlled by OBP recordings in this population. Furthermore, the high prevalence of non-dippers confirmed that circadian rhythm is commonly disturbed in KTRs.

Indexed as

ambulatory blood pressure monitoringhypertensionkidney transplantationmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35035934
PMCPMC8757429
OpenAlexW3203100725

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.