ReviewHeart failure reviews2022
Stepwise approach for diagnosis and management of Takotsubo syndrome with cardiac imaging tools.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress in Takotsubo Syndrome: Insights into Extracellular Vesicles and Their Potential Clinical Relevance.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stress-Induced Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Identified by Unique Nuclear Perfusion Pattern.Cureus · 2026Article
- Review
- Takotsubo Syndrome: An International Expert Consensus Report on Practical Challenges and Specific Conditions (Part-2: Specific Entities, Risk Stratification and Challenges After Recovery)Balkan medical journal · 2024Article
- Takotsubo Syndrome and Gender Differences: Exploring Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Clinical Differences for a Personalized Approach in Patient Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Exploring the Applicability of Pre-Anesthetic Cardiac POCUS in Unexpected Conditions: Could it be Helpful?POCUS journal · 2023Review
- Role of CT and MRI in Cardiac Emergencies.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Review
- Takotsubo Syndrome in the Emergency Room - Diagnostic Challenges and Suggested Algorithm.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Takotsubo syndrome is featured by transient left ventricle dysfunction in the absence of significant coronary artery disease, mainly triggered by emotional or physical stress. Its clinical presentation is similar to acute coronary syndrome; therefore, cardiac imaging tools have a crucial role. Coronary angiography is mandatory for exclusion of pathological stenosis. On the other side, transthoracic echocardiography is the first non-invasive imaging modality for an early evaluation of left ventricle systolic and diastolic function. Left ventricle morphologic patterns could be identified according to the localization of wall motion abnormalities. Moreover, an early identification of potential mechanical and electrical complications such as left ventricle outflow tract obstruction, mitral regurgitation, thrombus formation, right ventricular involvement, cardiac rupture, and cardiac rhythm disorders could provide additional information for clinical management and therapy. Because of the dynamic evolution of the syndrome, comprehensive serial echocardiographic examinations should be systematically performed. Advanced techniques, including speckle-tracking echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and nuclear imaging can provide mechanistic and pathophysiologic insights into this syndrome. This review focuses on these aspects and provide a stepwise approach of all cardiac imaging tools for the diagnosis and the management of Takotsubo syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35040000What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.